Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is the most commonly performed cardiac surgery procedure [1]. Approximately 62 procedures are performed per 100,000 inhabitants in Europe each year [2]. However, the complication rate is still relatively high, even after scheduled CABG [3]. Among the many problems related to CABG, the most important aspect, which might be affected by anesthetic care, is postoperative pain [4]. Many patients still suffer from severe pain after CABG
Background: Severe postoperative pain is a significant problem after cesarean sections. Methods: This study was a randomized, controlled trial of 105 patients conducted in two hospitals. All patients were anesthetized spinally for elective cesarean section. Each participant was randomly allocated to one of three study groups: the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) group, the transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) group, or the control (CON) group. The primary outcome of this study determined acute pain intensity on the visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes determined morphine consumption and chronic pain evaluation according to the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) after hospital discharge. Results: At rest, the pain intensity was significantly higher in the CON group than in the QLB and TAPB groups at hours two and eight. Upon activity, the pain in the control subjects was more severe than in the QLB and TAPB groups in three and two of five measurements, respectively. Moreover, morphine consumption was significantly lower in the QLB (9 (5–10)) and TAPB (10 (6–14)) groups than in the CON (16 (11–19)) group. Persistent postoperative pain was significantly lower in the QLB group than in the CON group at months one and six following hospital discharge. Conclusions: Both the QLB and TAPB can improve pain management after cesarean delivery. Moreover, the QLB might reduce the severity of persistent postoperative pain months after cesarean section.
Introduction: One of the main challenges in cardiac surgery is effective postoperative analgesia. Erector spinae-plane block (ESP block) is a novel regional technique, introduced by Forero in 2016 for neuropathic chest pain, then used successfully for mastectomy. Aim: To establish the efficacy of the ESP block in patients undergoing mitral and/or tricuspid valve repair through a right mini-thoracotomy. Material and methods: It is a prospective observational cohort study performed in a tertiary health center. In the treatment group, a single-shot ESP block was performed before anesthetic induction. General anesthesia was induced with etomidate, remifentanil, and rocuronium, and continued with sevoflurane and remifentanil. Remifentanil infusion was continued for 2 h post-operatively, then stopped, and the patient's trachea was extubated. Patient-controlled analgesia was started with oxycodone immediately. Total oxycodone consumption and pain severity on the visual analog scale during the first 24 h were analyzed. In the control group, no regional block was performed. Instead of remifentanil, fentanyl was used. Patients were extubated on the second day. Pain was treated with morphine, administered according to nurses' discretion. Pain intensity was evaluated on the numerical rating scale. Results: Nineteen patients were evaluated in the ESP and 25 in the control group. Mechanical ventilation time was shorter in the ESP group (0.6 (0.4-1.1) h) than in the control one (10 (8-17) h, p = 0.00001). Moreover, patients in the ESP group spent fewer days in the intensive care unit (1 (1-1) vs. (2 (2-2), p = 0.0001). Conclusions: The ESP block seems to be safe and efficient for pain control in patients undergoing right mini-thoracotomy for mitral and/or tricuspid valve repair.
A b s t r a c tIntroduction: Working on the institutional Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS Cardio) protocol for off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OP-CABG) we have noticed that patients treated according to the modified anesthesia protocol had not only significantly shorter time of respiratory support and intensive care unit stay but also lower postoperative troponin T concentration than patients who had standard fentanyl/sevoflurane-based anesthesia. Aim: To compare the perioperative course of patients undergoing OP-CABG surgery and receiving standard fentanyl/ sevoflurane anesthesia and those anesthetized according to the institutional ERAS Cardio protocol with remifentanil, sevoflurane, and bilateral extensor spinae plane (ESP) block. Material and methods: Design: a prospective, open-label, observational study performed in a tertiary health center. Participants: 30 consecutive patients undergoing off-pump coronary bypass graft surgery. Interventions: 15 patients had standard anesthesia with etomidate, fentanyl, and rocuronium for induction and fentanyl/sevoflurane for maintenance (standard group); 15 others had bilateral single shot ESP block, then etomidate, remifentanil and rocuronium for induction, and remifentanil/sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia. Results: Median time to extubation was 7.6 (5.5-12.5) h and 1.7 (1-3.25) h in "standard care" and ERAS groups, respectively (p = 0.00002). Length of stay in the intensive care unit was also shorter for patients in the h (p = 0.00001). Troponin concentration increased to a lesser extent in patients from the ERAS group: an increase of 151.8 (71.9-174.3) ng/ml vs. 253.8 (126.6-373.1) ng/ml, p = 0.008. Conclusions: Remifentanil/sevoflurane anesthesia combined with bilateral ESP block shortens mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay, and decreases postoperative troponin-T concentration in patients undergoing off-pump coronary bypass graft surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.