No abstract

Primary ventricularfibrillation was seen in 20 of 450 consecutive patients (4 4 %) admitted within 24 hours after the onset ofacute myocardial infarction. Compared withpatients withoutprimary ventricularfibrillation, they showed a lower mean age group and a higher incidence of anterior infarction. Waorning ventricular arrhythmias preceded primary ventricular fibrillation in 58 per cent of cases. However, warning arrhythmias were also present in 55 per cent ofpatients without primary ventricularfibrillation. Thefollowing mechanisms of initiation of primary ventricular fibrillation were seen. 1) In one patient, it was initiated by supraventricular premature beats showing aberrant intraventricular conduction. 2) In 2 patients, ventricular tachycardia degenerated into primary ventricular fibrillation. 3) In 17 patients, it was initiated by a ventricular premature beat; in 10 of these, the premature beat showed early coupling (RR'/QT<1-the R-on-T phnomenon). However, ventrcular premature beats showing the R-on-T phenomenon were also observed in 49 per cent of patients without pmary ventilar fibrillation. In 7, primary ventricular fibrllation was initiated by a late-coupled ventricular premature beat (RR'/QT>1); in 2, the very late coupling resulted in a ventricular fusion beat. The study suggests that waring arrhythmias and the R-on-T phenomenon are poor predictors ofprimary ventricularfibrillation in acute myocardial infarction. The observation that 41 per cent ofprimary ventricularfibrillation was initiated by a late-coupled ventricular premature beat suggests that ventricular vulnerability during acute myocardial infarction may extend throughout most of the cardiac cycle and is not necessarily confined to the QT interval.

Isolated preparations of portions of the canine intraventricular conducting system were studied by microelectrode techniques in order to determine the nature of transverse spread and longitudinal dissociation of impulses in bundle branches and false tendons. Driving stimuli were delivered to an eccentric location on normal conducting tissue, and the arrival times of the propagating impulses were mapped along the length and width of the bundle branch, or along the false tendon ipsilateral and contralateral to the site of stimulation. The difference between the arrival times on the two sides was found to decrease progressively as a function of distance from the site of stimulation, the data suggesting that transverse spread of impulses involves propagation through transverse crossover points between the longitudinally oriented conducting elements. Impulses originating eccentrically became uniformly conducted across the transverse axis of bundle branches 8-15 mm from the level of the stimulating electrode, and of false tendons 2-4 mm from the stimulus site. True longitudinal dissociation, producing conduction maps different from those representing normal transverse propagation, was seen occasionally in tissue having longitudinally oriented strips of abnormal tissue. However, early premature stimulation commonly resulted in longitudinal temporal dissociation of the premature responses, possibly due to functional block in the transverse crossover fibers.

SUMMARY Eleven patients were studied and a total of 144 Wenckebach cycles in the AV node and 118 Wenckebach cycles in the His-Purkinje system were analysed to determine the incidence of typical and atypical Wenckebach periodicity, with particular emphasis on one variant of atypical Wenckebach that may simulate a Mobitz type II block. This pseudo-Mobitz II pattern was defined as a long Wenckebach cycle in which, at least, the last three beats ofthe cycle show relatively constant PR intervals (variation of no more than 0-02 s in surface leads and no more than 10 ms in His bundle electrograms) and in which the PR interval immediately following the blocked beat is shorter than the PR interval before the block by 004 s or more. Atypical Wenckebach cycles were found to be more common than the typical variety at both the AV node (67 %) and His-Purkinje system (69 %). The pseudo-Mobitz II pattern was seen in 19 per cent of atypical AV nodal Wenckebach periods and in 17 per cent of atypical His-Purkinje system Wenckebach cycles. The need to discern a 'classical' Mobitz II block from a pseudo-Mobitz II pattern, especially in the setting of an acute inferior myocardial infarction, is emphasised.

His bundle recordings were studied in four patients with short P-R and A-H intervals, and narrow QRS complexes, who had experienced several episodes of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. The heart was paced from the high right atrium (HRA) and the coronary sinus (CS). In three patients the A-H Wenckebach phenomenon occurred at higher rates (greater than 200 pacing beats/min) when the CS was paced than when pacing was performed from the HRA. Moreover, CS stimulation produced smaller increments in the A-H interval than did pacing from HRA. The extrastimulus method of testing was done. In cases 1 and 2 the functional refractory period of the A-H tissues was 15 to 25 msec shorter during CS pacing than when pacing from the HRA. In case 3, the low right atrium (LRA) as well as the other two sites were paced. A type 1 gap was seen from HRA, a type 2 gap from CS, and both types appeared when the LRA was paced. Case 4, in which the mid-right atrium (MRA) was also stimulated, had a double pathway from HRA and CS with conduction through the accessory pathway late in the cycle and through the A-V node earlier in the cycle. However, the A-V node could not be penetrated during MRA stimulation. It appeared that the pacing site influenced the A-H conduction pattern and refractoriness, possibly by changing the site and/or mode of entry of the stimulus into the pathways that are responsible for this syndrome.