Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential-tremor (ET). In adaptive DBS (aDBS) systems, online tuning of stimulation parameters as a function of neural signals may improve treatment efficacy and reduce side-effects. State-of-the-art aDBS systems use symptom surrogates derived from neural signals-so-called neural markers (NMs)-defined on the patient-group level, and control strategies assuming stationarity of symptoms and NMs. We aim at improving these aDBS systems with (1) a data-driven approach for identifying patient-and session-specific NMs and (2) a control strategy coping with short-term non-stationary dynamics. The two building blocks are implemented as follows: (1) The data-driven NMs are based on a machine learning model estimating tremor intensity from electrocorticographic signals. (2) The control strategy accounts for local variability of tremor statistics. Our study with three chronically implanted ET patients amounted to five online sessions. Tremor quantified from accelerometer data shows that symptom suppression is at least equivalent to that of a continuous DBS strategy in 3 out-of 4 online tests, while considerably reducing net stimulation (at least 24%). In the remaining online test, symptom suppression was not significantly different from either the continuous strategy or the no treatment condition. We introduce a novel aDBS system for ET. It is the first aDBS system based on (1) a machine learning model to identify session-specific NMs, and (2) a control strategy coping with short-term non-stationary dynamics. We show the suitability of our aDBS approach for ET, which opens the door to its further study in a larger patient population.

Objective-Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a safe and established treatment for essential tremor (ET) and several other movement disorders. One approach to improving DBS therapy is adaptive DBS (aDBS), in which stimulation parameters are modulated in real time based on biofeedback from either external or implanted sensors. Previously tested systems have fallen short of translational applicability due to the requirement for patients to continuously wear the necessary sensors or processing devices, as well as privacy and security concerns. Approach-We designed and implemented a translation-ready training data collection system for fully implanted aDBS. Two patients chronically implanted with electrocorticography strips over the hand portion of M1 and DBS probes in the ipsilateral ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus for treatment of ET were recruited for this study. Training was conducted using a translation-ready distributed training procedure, allowing a substantially higher degree of control over data collection than previous works. A linear classifier was trained using this system, biased towards activating stimulation in accordance with clinical considerations. Main Results-The clinically relevant average false negative rate, defined as fraction of time during which stimulation dropped below 1 2 clinical levels during movement epochs, was 0.036. Tremor suppression, calculated through analysis of gyroscope data, was 33.2% more effective on average with aDBS than with continuous DBS. During a period of free movement with aDBS, one patient reported a slight paresthesia; patients noticed no difference in treatment efficacy between systems. Significance-Here is presented the first translation-ready training procedure for a fully embedded aDBS control system for MDs and one of the first examples of such a system in ET, adding to the consensus that fully implanted aDBS systems are sufficiently mature for broader deployment in treatment of movement disorders.

Objectives. Deep brain stimulation programming for movement disorders requires systematic fine tuning of stimulation parameters to ameliorate tremor and other symptoms while avoiding side effects. DBS programming can be a time-consuming process and requires clinical expertise to assess response to DBS to optimize therapy for each patient. In this study, we describe and evaluate an automated, closed-loop, and patient-specific framework for DBS programming that measures tremor using a smartwatch and automatically changes DBS parameters based on the recommendations from a closed-loop optimization algorithm thus eliminating the need for an expert clinician. Approach. Bayesian optimization which is a sample-efficient global optimization method was used as the core of this DBS programming framework to adaptively learn each patient’s response to DBS and suggest the next best settings to be evaluated. Input from a clinician was used initially to define a maximum safe amplitude, but we also implemented ‘safe Bayesian optimization’ to automatically discover tolerable exploration boundaries. Results. We tested the system in 15 patients (9 with Parkinson’s disease and 6 with essential tremor). Tremor suppression at best automated settings was statistically comparable to previously established clinical settings. The optimization algorithm converged after testing 15.1±0.7 settings when maximum safe exploration boundaries were predefined, and 17.7±4.9 when the algorithm itself determined safe exploration boundaries. Significance. We demonstrate that fully automated DBS programming framework for treatment of tremor is efficient and safe while providing outcomes comparable to that achieved by expert clinicians.

Objective: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a safe and established treatment for essential tremor (ET) and several other movement disorders. One approach to improving DBS therapy is adaptive DBS (aDBS), in which stimulation parameters are modulated in real time based on biofeedback from either external or implanted sensors. Previously tested systems have fallen short of translational applicability due to the requirement for patients to continuously wear the necessary sensors or processing devices, as well as privacy and security concerns. Approach: We designed and implemented a translation-ready training data collection system for fully implanted aDBS. Two patients chronically implanted with electrocorticography strips over the hand portion of M1 and DBS probes in the ipsilateral ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus for treatment of ET were recruited for this study. Training was conducted using a translation-ready distributed training procedure, allowing a substantially higher degree of control over data collection than previous works. A linear classifier was trained using this system, biased towards activating stimulation in accordance with clinical considerations. Main Results: The clinically relevant average false negative rate, defined as fraction of time during which stimulation dropped below 1/2 clinical levels during movement epochs, was 0.036. Tremor suppression, calculated through analysis of gyroscope data, was 33.2% more effective on average with aDBS than with continuous DBS. During a period of free movement with aDBS, one patient reported a slight paresthesia; patients noticed no difference in treatment efficacy between systems. Significance: Here is presented the first translation-ready training procedure for a fully embedded aDBS control system for MDs and one of the first examples of such a system in ET, adding to the consensus that fully implanted aDBS systems are sufficiently mature for broader deployment in treatment of movement disorders.

No abstract