Cyclin D dependent kinases (CDK4 and CDK6) regulate entry into S phase of the cell cycle and are validated targets for anticancer drug discovery. Herein we detail the discovery of a novel series of 4-thiazol-N-(pyridin-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine derivatives as highly potent and selective inhibitors of CDK4 and CDK6. Medicinal chemistry optimization resulted in 83, an orally bioavailable inhibitor molecule with remarkable selectivity. Repeated oral administration of 83 caused marked inhibition of tumor growth in MV4-11 acute myeloid leukemia mouse xenografts without having a negative effect on body weight and showing any sign of clinical toxicity. The data merit 83 as a clinical development candidate.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia with dismal long-term prognosis with age. The most aggressive subtype of AML is MLL-AML that is characterized by translocations of the mixed-lineage leukemia gene (MLL) and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Cyclin dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) plays a crucial role in the MLL-driven oncogenic transcription, and hence, inhibiting activity of CDK9 has been proposed as a promising strategy for treatment of AML. We investigated the therapeutic potential of CDKI-73, one of the most potent CDK9 inhibitors, against a panel of AML cell lines and samples derived from 97 patients. CDKI-73 induced cancer cells undergoing apoptosis through transcriptional downregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and XIAP by majorly targeting CDK9. Contrastively, it was relatively low toxic to the bone marrow cells of healthy donors. In MV4-11 xenograft mouse models, oral administration of CDKI-73 resulted in a marked inhibition of tumor growth (p < 0.0001) and prolongation of animal life span (P < 0.001) without causing body weight loss and other overt toxicities. The study suggests that CDKI-73 can be developed as a highly efficacious and orally deliverable therapeutic agent for treatment of AML.
Aims
Long‐term use of the immunosuppressant tacrolimus is limited by nephrotoxicity. Following renal transplantation, the risk of nephrotoxicity may be determined more by allograft than by blood tacrolimus concentrations, and thus may be affected by donor CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genetics. Little is known regarding factors that determine tacrolimus intrarenal exposure.
Methods
This study investigated the relationship between trough blood (C0Blood) and allograft (CGraft) tacrolimus concentrations and tacrolimus dose, haematocrit, genetics, acute nephrotoxicity, rejection status, delayed graft function, and time post‐transplant. C0Blood and CGraft were quantified in 132 renal transplant recipients together with recipient and donor CYP3A5 (rs776746) and ABCB1 3435 (rs1045642) genotypes.
Results
C0Blood ranged from 2.6 to 52.3 ng/mL and CGraft from 33 to 828 pg/mg tissue. Adjusting for dose, recipients who were CYP3A5 expressors had lower C0Blood compared to nonexpressors, whilst delayed graft function was associated with higher C0Blood. Linear regression showed that the significant predictors of CGraft were C0Blood (point‐wise P = 7 × 10−10), dose (P = .004) acute nephrotoxicity (P = .002) and an interaction between C0Blood and acute tacrolimus nephrotoxicity (P = .0002), with an adjusted r2 = 0.35 and no contribution from donor or recipient CYP3A5 or ABCB1 genotype. The association between CGraft and acute nephrotoxicity depended on one very high CGraft (828 pg/mg tissue).
Conclusions
Recipient and donor CYP3A5 and ABCB1 3435C>T genotypes are not determinants of allograft tacrolimus exposure in kidney transplant recipients. However, tacrolimus dose and C0Blood were significant predictors of CGraft, and the relationship between C0Blood and CGraft appeared to differ in the presence or absence of acute nephrotoxicity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.