Clinical manifestations of leptospirosis are diverse and very similar to other febrile diseases, hence early and accurate detection of subclinical infections is a key element in disease control. We evaluated immunomagnetic separation (IMS) capture technology coupled with a standard quantitative PCR (qPCR) system for the detection of pathogenic Leptospira in urine samples from 803 cows from dairy herds with a history of clinical cases of leptospirosis. The urine samples were first processed in a purification step, then subdivided into 2 subsamples, one that continued to DNA extraction and direct qPCR, and one that was pretreated by IMS before continuing to DNA extraction and qPCR. Overall, 133 of 803 (16.6%) samples were IMS-qPCR positive, whereas only 92 of 803 (11.5%) were positive when using direct qPCR. Statistically significant differences were observed between the mean estimated Leptospira load between the IMS-qPCR and the direct qPCR positive urine samples. The IMS-qPCR technology revealed a larger number of positive results and higher bacterial loads than direct qPCR. This difference is most likely the result of the high antigen-binding capacity and capture efficiency of the IMS system. The use of polyclonal antibodies produced by the inoculation of 3 synthetic peptides, which make up the extracellular regions of the LipL32 protein, provided a high detection capacity to the IMS-qPCR technique, resulting in performance superior to direct qPCR.
Natural herbivore populations have experienced uninterrupted pressures from direct and evident domestic‐wildlife interactions and competition, to indirect or less obvious ones such as pathogen transmission. Thus, pathogen spillover between wild and domestic animals is a constant concern because the domestic–wildlife interface represents the ecological frontier in which pathogen transmission takes place in both directions. In Patagonian steppe communities, extensive sheep ranching and guanaco (Lama guanicoe) populations coexist, and guanaco have shown to be infected by pathogens such as Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) likely transmitted from livestock. MAP causes chronic enteritis and affects mostly domestic ruminants. We evaluated MAP prevalence and pathogen shedding in both species’ faeces collected in non‐shared and shared sites according to presence/absence of sheep and guanaco along a year, in four different seasons (autumn, winter, and spring 2018, and summer 2019). Our results indicate that MAP circulates in both sheep and guanaco populations with self‐sustained transmission; however, both species differ in their levels of competence. We detected higher pathogen shedding in sites occupied by sheep, suggesting that sheep populations may be the main source of infection for susceptible animals due to their large numbers which drive MAP dynamics.
In a huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) population sympatric with cattle, we found evidence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) infection. Three huemul faecal pellet samples and two cows pats were collected and cultured for MAP presence. DNA was then extracted for PCR analysis of all signal-positive cultures. To assess whether MAP isolates obtained from huemul faeces were associated with typical MAP isolated from livestock, positive confirmed culture samples were sub-typed using a combination of five Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit-Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis and one Short Sequence Repeat analysis markers. All faecal samples from both species were MAP positive. One huemul presented a different bacteria profile genotype not described before, suggesting that huemul and cattle in Patagonia could carry a unique MAP strain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.