Automated vehicles need to interact: to create mutual awareness and to coordinate maneuvers. How this interaction shall be achieved is still an open issue. Several new protocols are discussed for cooperative services such as changing lanes or overtaking, e.g., within the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) and Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). These communication protocols are, however, usually specific to individual maneuvers or based on implicit assumptions on other vehicles' intentions. To enable reuse and support extensibility towards future maneuvers, we propose CVIP, a protocol framework for complex vehicular interactions. CVIP supports explicitly negotiating maneuvers between the involved vehicles and allows monitoring maneuver progress via status updates. We present our design in detail and demonstrate via simulations that it enables complex intervehicle interactions in a flexible, efficient and robust manner.We also discuss open questions to be answered before complex interactions among automated vehicles can become a reality.

No abstract

No abstract

Automated vehicles will be able to drive autonomously in various environments. An essential part of that is to predict other vehicles' intents and to coordinate maneuvers jointly. Such cooperative maneuvers have the ability to make driving safer and traffic more efficient. However, among the various communication protocols proposed for maneuver coordination, no single one satisfies all requirements. This paper assesses failure risks and mitigation strategies for cooperative maneuvers, including an analysis of popular protocols regarding this aspect. Next, we evaluate one particular cooperation protocol, the complex vehicular interactions protocol (CVIP), concerning performance of mitigation mechanisms and their influence on maneuver success rates or times to reach consensus among maneuver participants. Via simulation, we show that CVIP is suitable for cooperative maneuvers in realistic scenarios and investigate the trade-offs individual mitigation mechanisms face. These results are well-suited as guidelines and benchmark for other researchers developing cooperative maneuver protocols.