SummaryBackgroundOesophageal adenocarcinoma is the sixth most common cause of cancer death worldwide and Barrett's oesophagus is the biggest risk factor. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose esomeprazole proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and aspirin for improving outcomes in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.MethodsThe Aspirin and Esomeprazole Chemoprevention in Barrett's metaplasia Trial had a 2 × 2 factorial design and was done at 84 centres in the UK and one in Canada. Patients with Barrett's oesophagus of 1 cm or more were randomised 1:1:1:1 using a computer-generated schedule held in a central trials unit to receive high-dose (40 mg twice-daily) or low-dose (20 mg once-daily) PPI, with or without aspirin (300 mg per day in the UK, 325 mg per day in Canada) for at least 8 years, in an unblinded manner. Reporting pathologists were masked to treatment allocation. The primary composite endpoint was time to all-cause mortality, oesophageal adenocarcinoma, or high-grade dysplasia, which was analysed with accelerated failure time modelling adjusted for minimisation factors (age, Barrett's oesophagus length, intestinal metaplasia) in all patients in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2004-003836-77.FindingsBetween March 10, 2005, and March 1, 2009, 2557 patients were recruited. 705 patients were assigned to low-dose PPI and no aspirin, 704 to high-dose PPI and no aspirin, 571 to low-dose PPI and aspirin, and 577 to high-dose PPI and aspirin. Median follow-up and treatment duration was 8·9 years (IQR 8·2–9·8), and we collected 20 095 follow-up years and 99·9% of planned data. 313 primary events occurred. High-dose PPI (139 events in 1270 patients) was superior to low-dose PPI (174 events in 1265 patients; time ratio [TR] 1·27, 95% CI 1·01–1·58, p=0·038). Aspirin (127 events in 1138 patients) was not significantly better than no aspirin (154 events in 1142 patients; TR 1·24, 0·98–1·57, p=0·068). If patients using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were censored at the time of first use, aspirin was significantly better than no aspirin (TR 1·29, 1·01–1·66, p=0·043; n=2236). Combining high-dose PPI with aspirin had the strongest effect compared with low-dose PPI without aspirin (TR 1·59, 1·14–2·23, p=0·0068). The numbers needed to treat were 34 for PPI and 43 for aspirin. Only 28 (1%) participants reported study-treatment-related serious adverse events.InterpretationHigh-dose PPI and aspirin chemoprevention therapy, especially in combination, significantly and safely improved outcomes in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.FundingCancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, Wellcome Trust, and Health Technology Assessment.

Pathological stage correlates with telomerase activity of the malignant cell population of the primary tumour in colorectal cancer. This suggests that telomerase activity increases during the progression of a cancer and may have implications for the design of anticancer (antitelomerase) agents.

There is a difference between gastric and oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinomas in terms of the relationship with telomerase expression and clinico-pathological variables. Among patients with distal gastric adenocarcinoma, telomerase activity correlates with markers of advanced disease, whereas this relationship does not hold true in oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. Telomerase activation may occur at different stages of the formation of the malignant phenotype in these two cancers and may reflect differences in their pathogenesis. Telomerase could be a prognostic marker in gastric but not in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is composed of multiple lineages including Paneth cells and endocrine cells in addition to gastric and intestinal cells. Although the origin of the BE stem cell is a matter of conjecture, the stem cells are clearly multipotent, and therefore the phenotype is restricted by genomic imprinting (termed restricted potency). Recent evidence suggests that the microenvironment may select various lineages. In this regard the proportion of gastric and specialized intestinal metaplastic cells has been attributed to the composition of the refluxate, acid or bile, respectively. Experimental evidence also implicates specific xenobiotics in this process, including bile acids. In particular we discuss the potential biologic roles of bile acids in epithelial adaptation from in vivo and in vitro models.