Rhizobial Nod factors are key symbiotic signals responsible for starting the nodulation process in host legume plants. Of the six Medicago truncatula genes controlling a Nod factor signaling pathway, Nod Factor Perception (NFP) was reported as a candidate Nod factor receptor gene. Here, we provide further evidence for this by showing that NFP is a lysine motif (LysM)-receptorlike kinase (RLK). NFP was shown both to be expressed in association with infection thread development and to be involved in the infection process. Consistent with deviations from conserved kinase domain sequences, NFP did not show autophosphorylation activity, suggesting that NFP needs to associate with an active kinase or has unusual functional characteristics different from classical kinases. Identification of nine new M. truncatula LysM-RLK genes revealed a larger family than in the nonlegumes Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) or rice (Oryza sativa) of at least 17 members that can be divided into three subfamilies. Three LysM domains could be structurally predicted for all M. truncatula LysM-RLK proteins, whereas one subfamily, which includes NFP, was characterized by deviations from conserved kinase sequences. Most of the newly identified genes were found to be expressed in roots and nodules, suggesting this class of receptors may be more extensively involved in nodulation than was previously known.

Long non-protein coding RNAs (npcRNA) represent an emerging class of riboregulators, which either act directly in this long form or are processed to shorter miRNA and siRNA. Genome-wide bioinformatic analysis of full-length cDNA databases identified 76 Arabidopsis npcRNAs. Fourteen npcRNAs were antisense to protein-coding mRNAs, suggesting cis-regulatory roles. Numerous 24-nt siRNA matched to five different npcRNAs, suggesting that these npcRNAs are precursors of this type of siRNA. Expression analyses of the 76 npcRNAs identified a novel npcRNA that accumulates in a dcl1 mutant but does not appear to produce trans-acting siRNA or miRNA. Additionally, another npcRNA was the precursor of miR869 and shown to be up-regulated in dcl4 but not in dcl1 mutants, indicative of a young miRNA gene. Abiotic stress altered the accumulation of 22 npcRNAs among the 76, a fraction significantly higher than that observed for the RNA binding protein-coding fraction of the transcriptome. Overexpression analyses in Arabidopsis identified two npcRNAs as regulators of root growth during salt stress and leaf morphology, respectively. Hence, together with small RNAs, long npcRNAs encompass a sensitive component of the transcriptome that have diverse roles during growth and differentiation.[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]Non-protein coding RNAs (npcRNAs) are a class of RNAs that do not encode proteins, but instead their function lies on the RNA molecule. They are a heterogeneous group and have been divided into different classes according to their length and function. With respect to length, npcRNAs can range from 20 to 27 nucleotides (nt) for the families of microRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), 20-300 nt for small RNAs commonly found as transcriptional and translational regulators, or up to and beyond 10,000 nt for medium and large RNAs involved in other processes, including splicing, gene inactivation, and translation (Costa 2007). We use the term non-protein-coding RNAs instead of noncoding RNAs as every sequence has the potential to be coding, and certain large npcRNAs might encode small oligopeptides, which could be translated under specific conditions as shown for a pentapeptide located inside rRNA, a canonical RNA in Escherichia coli (Tenson et al. 1996). In recent years, numerous novel npcRNA candidates have been identified in a variety of organisms from E. coli to Homo sapiens (Argaman et al. 2001;Storz et al. 2004;Washietl et al. 2005).Several strategies have been employed to detect and discover novel npcRNAs, including both experimental and computational screenings (Huttenhofer et al. 2002). Genomic approaches, such as tiling arrays and systematic sequencing of full-length cDNA libraries, in model organisms have recently revealed that much larger portions of eukaryote transcriptomes represent nonprotein-coding transcripts than previously believed (Okazaki et al. 2002;Numata et al. 2003;Rinn et al. 2003;Ota et al. 2004;Chekanova et al. 2007). Diverse npcRNAs, including a surpris...

In this study, we describe a large-scale expression-profiling approach to identify genes differentially regulated during the symbiotic interaction between the model legume Medicago truncatula and the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti. Macro-and microarrays containing about 6,000 probes were generated on the basis of three cDNA libraries dedicated to the study of root symbiotic interactions. The experiments performed on wild-type and symbiotic mutant material led us to identify a set of 756 genes either up-or down-regulated at different stages of the nodulation process. Among these, 41 known nodulation marker genes were up-regulated as expected, suggesting that we have identified hundreds of new nodulation marker genes. We discuss the possible involvement of this wide range of genes in various aspects of the symbiotic interaction, such as bacterial infection, nodule formation and functioning, and defense responses. Importantly, we found at least 13 genes that are good candidates to play a role in the regulation of the symbiotic program. This represents substantial progress toward a better understanding of this complex developmental program.Legume plants have the unique capacity to enter a nitrogen-fixing endosymbiosis with prokaryotes of the genera Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Mesorhizobium, and Bradyrhizobium (collectively termed rhizobia). In exchange for plant photosynthates, the endosymbiotic rhizobia convert dinitrogen to ammonia that is supplied to the plant for incorporation into amino acids and ultimately proteins. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation thus allows legumes to grow and produce protein-rich seeds even on nitrogen-depleted soil.Endosymbiotic interactions represent a particular case of biotrophic interactions (Parniske, 2000) where the microorganism is enclosed in a host-derived membrane within transient organelles, termed symbiosomes. These are harbored in a specific organ that differentiates from root tissues, the root nodule. Nodule formation and bacterial infection are strictly controlled by the plant (Schultze and Kondorosi, 1998;Stougaard, 2000). First of all, in wild-type legumes, nodulation is possible only when alternative sources of assimilable nitrogen (nitrate or ammonium) are not available. Second, legumes allow invasion of a very limited range of bacteria species producing highly specific signals, the Nod factors (chitolipooligosaccharidic molecules whose perception is essential to trigger the plant symbiotic program), and proper cell wall components (notably exopolysaccharides and lipopolysaccharides). Finally, nodules and infection threads (tubular structures of plant origin) develop in defined places and limited numbers. This is regulated by the plant via a locally operating mechanism that involves the plant hormone ethylene and a systemically operating mechanism, with a mobile signal of as yet unknown nature . In our experimental system, the differentiation of a nitrogen-fixing nodule takes about 1 week. Such a functional nodule consists of central tissues (the distal meris...