Bu araştırmada üniversite öğrencilerinde özgecilik ve mükemmeliyetçilik anlayışları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma İstanbul ilinde farklı devlet ve özel üniversitelerinde öğrenim görmekte olan 250'si kız, 250' si erkek olan toplam 500 üniversite öğrencisi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Katılılımcıların özgecilik düzeylerine ilişkin veriler Özgecilik Ölçeği, mükemmeliyetçilik düzeylerinin belirlenmesinde Kendini Mükemmeliyetçi Gösterme Ölçeği ve kişisel özelliklere ilişkin veriler araştırmacı tarafından hazırlanan Kişisel Bilgi Formu kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. Regresyon analizinde üniversite öğrencilerinde özgecilik düzeylerinin alt boyutlarından alınan puanlar yordanan değişken (gönüllü faaliyetlere katılım, maddi yardımı, travmatik durumlarda yardımı, yaşlı/ hastalara yardımı,fiziksel güce dayalı yardımı, eğitim sürecinde yardımı, yakınlık duygusundan kaynaklanan yardımı), mükemmeliyetçi kendini göstermenin alt boyutlarından (mükemmeliyetçi öz-tanıtım, kusur saklama ve kusuru açığa vurmama) alınan puanlar yordayıcı değişken olarak ele alınmıştır. Üniversite öğrencilerinde özgecilik anlayışının cinsiyete ve yaşa göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını incelemek için tek yönlü varyans analizi ve T testi analizleri yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, üniversite öğrencilerinde özgecilik davranışı ve mükemmeliyetçilik arasında anlamlı ilişkilerin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca kadınların erkeklerden daha fazla özgeci davranışta bulundukları, yaşı küçük olan üniversite öğrencilerinin büyük olanlara göre daha az özgeci davranış gösterdikleri de tespit edilmiştir.

We collaborated with stakeholders (e.g., students, educators) from Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) and active interdisciplinary social advocacy perspectives and used Online Photovoice (OPV) method to understand and address online/distance education's the most important facilitator and barriers for college students' in Turkey. Out of 260 students who consented to the study, 240 shared the most important facilitator,190 shared the most important barriers, and 190 students (27% male, 72% female) completed our contextual questions related to their education. We used Online Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (OIPA). Ten main facilitator themes emerged: advantages of using internet and technology (n = 104, 43%); enjoyable feelings (n = 61, 25%); saving time (n = 37; 15%); and social support (n = 28; 12%). Nine main barrier themes emerged: challenges of online education (n = 51, 31%); psychopathology and unenjoyable feelings, thoughts, and bodily sensations (n = 37, 19%); internet problems (n = 34, 18%); and Covid-19 restrictions (n = 30, 16%).

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine gambling addiction in terms of some demographic variables. Method: The data of the study were collected electronically through Google Form. Survey model, one of the quantitative research methods, was preferred in the study. The study group of the research consists of 400 male individuals living in Osmaniye neighborhood of Bakırköy district of Istanbul province, who play online games of chance from various internet sites and selected by convenient sampling method. Personal Information Form and South Oaks Gambling Addiction Scale prepared by the researcher were used to collect the research data. Results: In the study, a significant difference was found in South Oaks Gambling Screening Test scale scores according to marital status, perception of family relationships, education level of individuals, and perception of themselves as lucky. No significant differences were found in the South Oaks Gambling Screening Test scale scores according to the number of siblings, income levels, number of children, age at the beginning of gambling, education levels of the mothers of the individuals, education levels of the fathers of the individuals, alcohol use status of the individuals, smoking status of the individuals, and psychological social support status of the individuals. Conclusion: It is thought that problematic gambling behavior in individuals may reach dangerous dimensions due to the increasing popularity of gambling in the society and the easy access to gambling with the developing information systems and inadequate control.

No abstract

It is stated that the largest portion of immigrant origin living in Germany consists of people of Turkish origin. It is mentioned that Germany has a population of 82.4 million in 2016. Of these, 18.6 million are of immigrant origin. Migrants from Turkey are 2.8 million. These constitute 3.4 percent of the general population. Turkish people living in Germany, while maintaining their religious, national and ethnic identities on the one hand, form collective identities on the other. Immigrants who want to adapt to Germany among the Turkish people living in Germany aim to develop a collective identity in order to adapt more easily. Turkish people who live in Germany or come to Turkey as workers shows much difference in terms of culture, value and religion compared to the individuals who live in Turkey. This is because they are immigrants. As a result of the study, it is seen that there is a significant difference between the gender variable and the scale total score and the collective sub-dimension. Nevertheless, when the question "What are the problems of citizens of Turkish origin living in Germany?" is asked, the answers related exclusion, discrimination and cultural differences are collected. When the most suitable nationality is asked to the participants, all participants answered as "I am Turkish." Nonetheless, it is seen that the participants with German citizenship, Turkish citizenship and Turkish and German citizenship are involved. Therefore, it is possible to suggest that the participants' citizenship status has not changed their answer regarding the most suitable nationality.