Despite advances in understanding autoimmune diabetes in animal models, there has been little progress in altering the natural course of the human disease, which involves progression to insulin deficiency. Studies with immunosuppressive agents have shown short-term effectiveness, but they have not induced tolerance, and continuous treatment is needed. We studied the effects of hOKT3γ1(Ala-Ala), a humanized Fc mutated anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, on the progression of type 1 diabetes in patients with recent-onset disease in a randomized controlled trial. In general, the drug was well tolerated. A single course of treatment, within the first 6 weeks after diagnosis, preserved C-peptide responses to a mixed meal for 1 year after diagnosis (97 ± 9.6% of response at study entry in drug-treated patients vs. 53 ± 7.6% in control subjects, P < 0.01), with significant improvement in C-peptide responses to a mixed meal even 2 years after treatment (P < 0.02). The improved C-peptide responses were accompanied by reduced HbA1c and insulin requirements. Clinical responses to drug treatment were predicted by an increase in the relative number of CD8+ T-cells in the peripheral blood after the lymphocyte count recovered 2 weeks after the last dose of drug. We conclude that treatment with the anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody hOKT3γ1(Ala-Ala) results in improved C-peptide responses and clinical parameters in type 1 diabetes for at least 2 years in the absence of continued immunosuppressive medications.
Between 1984 and 1992, 559 patients with torticollis were treated with botulinum toxin type A (btx) injections. Twenty-four of these 559 patients (4.3%) had serological evidence of antibodies to btx by mouse neutralization assay. Some of the 559 patients had only one or two injection series, whereas others were lost to follow-up, so that the actual prevalence of serologically detectable antibodies may be higher than 4%. In addition, some patients who improved after btx injections lost benefit and stopped developing muscle atrophy from adequate doses of btx, without serological evidence of antibodies. To evaluate the risk factors for btx resistance (loss of benefit and muscle atrophy after injections with or without serological evidence of antibodies), we reviewed the records of a cohort of torticollis patients injected over 2-45 months (mean, 23 months) beginning in 1988. Eight of 76 patients (10.5%) developed btx resistance. Compared to nonresistant patients from the same cohort, these eight patients received more frequent injections, had more "booster injections" 2-3 weeks after an initial injection, and received higher doses of btx per treatment. In order to minimize the risk of developing btx resistance, therefore, we recommend that physicians wait as long as possible (at least 1 month) between btx injections, avoid booster injections, and use the smallest possible doses.
Our aim was to assess differences in the sensitivities of serologic tests used for the diagnosis of celiac disease among patients with varying degrees of villous atrophy. Among 115 adults with biopsy-proven celiac disease who fulfilled strict criteria, including serologic testing at the time of diagnosis and response to a gluten-free diet, 71% had total villous atrophy and 29% partial villous atrophy. Endomysial antibody was positive in 77% of those with total villous atrophy, compared to 33% with partial villous atrophy (P < 0.001). There was no difference in sensitivity when the type of presentation (classical vs. silent) was compared. Endomysial antibody-positive and negative patients did not differ with respect to age at diagnosis, duration of symptoms, mode of presentation, or family history of celiac disease. All anti-tissue transglutaminase-positive patients had TVA on biopsy. Seronegative celiac disease occurs. Endomysial antibody positivity correlates with more severe villous atrophy and not mode of presentation of celiac disease. Serologic tests, in clinical practice, lack the sensitivity reported in the literature.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.