Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is associated with osteopenia which could persist into adulthood affecting attainment of Peak Bone Mass thus resulting in osteoporosis in late adulthood. We previously reported a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial(the Cal study) showing significant bone health improvement with 2-year calcium(Ca)+Vit-D supplementation for AIS girls. This study addressed the important issue whether bone health improvement from the initial 2-year Ca+Vit-D supplementation could persist as subjects approached towards Peak Bone Mass at 6-year ie after 4-year of supplement discontinuation. This was an extension of the Cal study on AIS girls (11–14 years old, mean age=12.9 years, Tanner stage<IV) with femoral neck aBMD Z-score<0 and Cobb angle≥15∘. 330 subjects were randomized to Group1(placebo), Group2(600mgCa+400-IU-Vit-D3/day) or Group3(600mgCa+800-IU-Vit-D3/day) for 2-year supplementation after which supplementation was stopped. Investigations at baseline, 2-year and 6-year included High-resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography(HR-pQCT) at distal radius and Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry(DXA) at both hips. 270(81.8%) subjects completed 2-year supplementation when changes in left femoral neck aBMD, trabecular vBMD, Trabecular BV/TV, Trabecular Number and Trabecular Separation indicated significant bone health improvement with Ca+Vit-D supplementation(p<0.05). At 6-year(mean age=19.2 years), no between-group difference on bone parameters was noted except increase in Cortical Thickness being greater only in Group3 than in Group1. After 4-year supplement discontinuation, the treatment effect from the initial 2-year supplementation mostly dissipated indicating the need of continued supplementation in AIS girls to sustain therapeutic improvement on bone health as subjects approach towards Peak Bone Mass.
Aims: An overview of systematic reviews (SRs) and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to synthesize evidence of comparative effectiveness of different peri-discharge complex interventions for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions among heart failure (HF) patients. Methods: We searched five databases for SRs from their inception to August 2019 and conducted additional search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2003 and 2020. We used random-effect pairwise meta-analysis with pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify the effect of complex interventions, and NMA to evaluate comparative effectiveness among complex interventions. Primary outcome was 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions, while secondary outcomes were 30-day HF-related hospital readmissions, 30-day mortality, and 30-day emergency department visits. Results: From 20 SRs and additional RCT search, 21 eligible RCTs ( n = 5362) assessing eight different peri-discharge complex interventions were included. Pairwise meta-analysis showed no significant difference between peri-discharge complex interventions and controls on all outcomes, except that peri-discharge complex interventions were significantly more effective than controls in reducing 30-day mortality (pooled RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.49–0.95, 5 RCTs). NMA indicated that for reducing 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions, supportive–educative intervention had the highest probability to be the best intervention, followed by disease management; while for reducing 30-day HF-related hospital readmissions, disease management is likely to be the best intervention. Conclusions: Our results suggest that disease management has the best potential to reduce 30-day all-cause and HF-related hospital readmissions. Benefits of the interventions may vary across health system contexts. Evidence-based complex interventions require local adaptation prior to implementation.
Scoliosis screening is important for timely initiation of brace treatment to mitigate curve progression in skeletally immature children. Scoliosis screening programs frequently include the protocol of referring children screened positive with Scoliometer and Moiré Topography for confirmatory standard radiography. Despite being highly sensitive (88%) for detecting those who require specialist referral, the screening program was found to have more than 50% false positive rate that leads to unnecessary radiation exposure. Radiation-free ultrasound has been reported to be reliable for quantitative assessment of scoliosis curves. The aim of this prospective diagnostic accuracy study was to determine the accuracy of ultrasound in determining the referral status for children initially screened positive for scoliosis. 442 schoolchildren with a mean Cobb angle of 14.0 ± 6.6° were recruited. Using x-ray as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in predicting the correct referral status were 92.3% and 51.6% respectively. ROC curve analysis revealed an area under curve of 0.735 for ultrasound alone and 0.832 for ultrasound plus scoliometer measurement. The finding provided strong evidences on the accuracy of ultrasound in determining the referral status that could result in more than 50% reduction of unnecessary radiation exposure for children undergoing scoliosis screening.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.