There is a main difference between the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations/ PDPO (Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang/PKPU) and bankruptcy. They may become a solution when a business is entangled in financial problems or debts. Due to their differences, this study aims to ascertain the legal consequences arising from bankruptcy and the Composition Plan under the PDPO by analysing the court decision relating the Homologation Decision (the Endorsed Composition Plan). It adopts normative juridical research, therefore the data used is secondary data. Data collection techniques are a literature study in the form of legislation and literature and document study, especially the decision No.9/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN Smg in conjunction with No.13/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2016/PN Smg. It uses a qualitative descriptive analysis method. The study found that both the bankruptcy and PDPO have legal consequences on debtors and relevant stakeholders. The PDPO based on the Composition Plan results in the bankruptcy of a company if it still does not pay the debt as stipulated in the Homologation Decision (the Endorsed Composition Plan).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.