This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the GLS program at SMP Negeri 107 Jakarta. The method used is descriptive with a mixed approach (qualitative and quantitative). The results showed that: (1) Context evaluation, students, teachers and parents viewed the GLS program as needed by students; (2) input evaluation, the majority of teachers do not have adequate literacy capacity, the School Committee and parents support the GLS program, there is a Literacy Working Group Team and there is no public involvement; (3) Process evaluation, principals, teachers and education staff were involved in the 15 minute reading activity, the majority of teachers had taught the correct reading and summarizing strategies; (4) Product evaluation, the majority of students, teachers and parents feel the benefits of the GLS program, the GLS program affects learning activities, behavior, insights and skills of students. In conclusion, habituation of literacy activities in schools in the form of a 15-minute reading program, plus a literacy-rich physical environment and the use of literacy strategies in learning are proven to be able to form students' new skills.   Keywords: CIPP Evaluation, School Literacy Movement, Literacy Program

Pelaksanaan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (GLS) telah bergulir selama lima tahun sehingga program ini perlu dievaluasi keberhasilannya di ranah satuan pendidikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan kegiatan literasi terhadap prestasi belajar siswa di SMP Negeri 107 Jakarta. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII dan kelas IX berjumlah 216 orang. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah penyebaran kuesioner, wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tidak ada pengaruh kegiatan literasi terhadap prestasi belajar siswa SMP Negeri 107 Jakarta. Kegiatan literasi yang telah berjalan juga kurang efektif karena 1) siswa terlalu berfokus pada kegiatan merangkum daripada memahami bacaan, 2) tidak semua guru melakukan kegiatan tindak lanjut berupa tanggapan secara lisan dan tulisan, 3) tidak semua siswa memiliki kemampuan menggunakan strategi membaca, 4) tidak semua siswa menggunakan strategi membaca untuk memahami teks, dan 5) jumlah siswa yang menggunakan sumber nonpelajaran untuk memperkaya pengetahuan dalam mata pelajaran belum terlalu banyak.

Indonesia faces challenges in improving its literacy rank. In 2011, the literacy level of Indonesian fourth graders were in the 45th rank (with score 428 under 500) from 48 countries in PIRLS. In 2015 PISA’s report the fifteen-year-old Indonesian Junior High School students, occupied the 64th rank of 72 countries with score 396 under 496. To overcome this problem, the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture issued its Ministerial Regulation no. 23/2015 pertaining the students’ character building. This constitutes the basis of school-based literacy movement (Gerakan Literasi Sekolah). This study explores the praxis of literacy movement at one school (has implemented GLS since 2016) located in the condensed slum area of North Jakarta. Stratified purposeful sampling was deployed to select the research participants, i.e. 290 students and 20 teachers. The data were obtained from questionnaires and interviews. The result showed that not all teachers read the literacy guidelines determined by the government and their reading habit had not met the ideal number. Both teachers and students have different perception regarding to the time and frequency of schoolbased literacy activity. The fifteen minutes reading activity and reading strategies taught by the teachers were not varied. The teachers merely supervised the students while conducting the literacy activity. The students read the books they brought from home. The school-based literacy program gained the students’ literacy competence in understanding level (understand the content of the book they read) and built students’ character such as tolerance, teamwork skills, perseverance, responsibility, confidence, independence, politeness, and composure. Keywords: literacy movement, reading literacy, literacy competence, 15-minutereading activity