The determination of biomarkers in the blood specific for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is crucial for the selection of effective treatment strategies and the prediction of prognosis. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in LUSC and LUAD from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. In order to identify the potential biomarkers for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for clinical diagnosis, bioinformatics was used to analyze the DEGs of two subtypes of NSCLC, LUAD and LUSC. Exosomes were isolated from the serum of patients with LUAD or LUSC and identified using transmission electron microscopy, nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot analysis. A total of four differential exosomal mRNAs were selected for validation with serum samples from 70 patients with NSCLC via reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Receiver operating characteristic curves were established to evaluate the clinical diagnostic value of four DEGs for patients with LUAD and LUSC. The analysis based on TCGA data revealed the DEGs in LUSC and LUAD: A total of 1,619 genes were differentially expressed in patients with LUSC and LUAD. DEGs analyzed by Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analyses revealed that inflammation-related signaling pathways, such as complement pathways, and multiple autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and asthma were mainly enriched in LUAD. The cell cycle, Hippo signaling pathway, Rap1 signaling pathway and Wnt signaling pathway were the main signaling pathways enriched in LUSC. The combination of tumor protein P63 (TP63), keratin 5 (KRT5), CEA cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6) and surfactant protein B (SFTPB) improved the specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of different lung cancer subtypes. Exosomal TP63, KRT5, CEACAM6 and SFTPB mRNAs can thus be used as biomarkers to differentiate between LUSC and LUAD, and may provide a novel strategy for their differential diagnosis and treatment.

No abstract

310 Background: Taxane is one of the commonly used chemotherapy drugs for ESCC. Nab-paclitaxel, a small particle albumin-bound form of paclitaxel, showed potentially efficacy in metastatic ESCC. This randomized, controlled, multi-center study is conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin in neoadjuvant treatment of ESCC. Methods: Two hundred and two patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC which was located in the middle or lower third of the esophagus were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone. Patients were treated with either two 3-week cycles of nab-paclitaxel (125mg/m2, iv, d1, 8) and cisplatin (75mg/m2, iv, d1), followed by esophagectomy 4-6 weeks after neoadjuvant (the treatment arm) or directly underwent esophagectomy (the control arm). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), the secondary endpoints included 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rate, 1-, 2-, and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, R0 resection rate, reduction stage rate, chemotherapy-related adverse events. Results: Between April 2019 and June 2021, we randomly assigned 67 patients, of whom 31 in the treatment arm and 33 in the control arm were analyzed. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the two arms. In the treatment arm, 24 patients underwent R0 resection, and 2 did not undergo surgery although chemotherapy was completed. All patients in control arm underwent R0 resection. In the treatment arm, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 20.83%, the major pathological response (mPR) rate was 33.33%, and the down-staging rate was 58.33%. No difference in survival benefit was observed between the two arms. The 1- and 2-year DFS rates of the treatment arm and the control arm were 88.99% vs 75.58% (HR = 0.421, 95%CI: 0.087̃2.032, P = 0.281) and 88.99% vs 66.13% (HR = 0.387, 95%CI: 0.082̃1.833, P = 0.231), respectively. The 1-year and 2-year OS rates of the treatment arm and control arm were 93.21% vs 75.32% (HR = 0.293, 95%CI: 0.061̃1.409, P = 0.125) and 86.56% vs 75.32% (HR = 0.444, 95%CI: 0.115̃1.716, P = 0.239). The neoadjuvant chemotherapy was well tolerated. According to NCI-CTC AE V.5.0, the most common adverse events were hematological toxicity, including neutropenia (16.13%), anemia (3.23%) and hypoproteinemia (3.23%), no grade IV adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin for ESCC reveals a promising efficacy and safety, and has a tendency to prolong DFS and OS compared with surgery alone. The long-term results are worthy of further exploration. Clinical trial information: NCT03964753.