The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in patients with severe pre-LVAD renal dysfunction (RD). The cohort of 165 consecutive patients implanted with HeartMate II LVADs was divided into two groups: 1) baseline glomerular filtration rate (bGFR) ≤ 40 ml/min/1.73 m (n = 30), and 2) GFR > 40 ml/min/1.73 m (n = 135). In both groups, GFR increased significantly at 1 month and then declined, remaining higher than the pre-LVAD level in the bGFR ≤ 40 group and returning back to the pre-LVAD level in the bGFR > 40 group by 1 year post-LVAD follow-up. Post-LVAD dialysis was used in 20% of the bGFR ≤ 40 patients and 7% of the bGFR > 40 patients (p = 0.02). By 3 months, 14% patients had GFR ≤ 40 ml/min/1.73 m. Grade ≥2 tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-10.28; p = 0.02) and model for end-stage liver disease-XI score ≥ 17 (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.45-12.24; p = 0.01) were risk factors for severe RD at 3 months after LVAD implantation. Eight bGFR ≤ 40 patients underwent heart transplantation. Carefully selected patients with advanced heart dysfunction and bGFR ≤ 40 ml/min/1.73 m can improve kidney function with LVAD support and be able to bridge to isolated heart transplantation. Additional research is needed to refine patient selection for LVAD.
Background: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the utility of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) as a tool to evaluate for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) early in its course. Electrocardiography and echocardiography have limited sensitivity in this role, while advanced imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are limited by cost and availability. Methods: We compiled English language articles that reported left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) or global circumferential strain (GCS) in patients with confirmed extra-cardiac sarcoidosis versus healthy controls. Studies that exclusively included patients with probable or definite CS were excluded. Continuous data were pooled as a standard mean difference (SMD), comparing sarcoidosis group with healthy controls. A random-effect model was adopted in all analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q and I2 statistics. Results: Nine studies were included in our final analysis with an aggregate of 967 patients. LVGLS was significantly lower in the extra-cardiac sarcoidosis group as compared with controls, SMD −3.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): −5.32, −2.64, P < .001, also was significantly lower in patients who suffered major cardiac events (MCE), −3.89, 95% CI −6.14, −1.64, P < .001. GCS was significantly lower in the extra-cardiac sarcoidosis group as compared with controls, SMD: −3.33, 95% CI −4.71, −1.95, P < .001. Conclusion: LVGLS and GCS were significantly lower in extra-cardiac sarcoidosis patients despite not exhibiting any cardiac symptoms. LVGLS correlates with MCEs in CS. Further studies are required to investigate the role of STE in the early screening of CS.
In patients with stable coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved outcomes if the lesion is deemed significant by invasive functional assessment using fractional flow reserve. Recent studies have shown that a revascularization strategy using instantaneous wave-free ratio is noninferior to fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate-grade stenoses. The decision to perform coronary artery bypass grafting surgery is usually based on anatomic assessment of stenosis severity by coronary angiography. The data on the role of invasive functional assessment in guiding surgical revascularization are limited. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic and prognostic significance of invasive functional assessment in patients considered for coronary artery bypass grafting. In addition, we critically discuss ongoing and future clinical trials on the role of invasive functional assessment in surgical revascularization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.