In this study we investigate how 11 Swedish technology teachers perceive model functions in technology education. The main reason for investigating model functions in technology is an identified lack of knowledge about, and research studies into, a conscious use of models when teaching technology, even though models are part of technology education in many countries. In order to answer the research question of how technology teachers perceive model functions in technology education, we have used directed content analysis where Nia and de Vries (J Technol Des Educ 27:627–653, 2017) model functions constituted a framework. The teachers connect model functions to two teaching contexts: Design process and Explain and facilitate understanding of technological solutions. Model functions are understood as parts of the design process which relate to technology/engineering knowledge, a prescriptive way of understanding models. Models are also used to explain and clarify specific technological situations or functions when teaching technology closely related to a scientific, descriptive way of using models. Five of Nia and de Vries model functions are identified in this empirical study. This strengthens the importance of addressing model functions in technological education.

In this study, we aim to investigate activities using models in a design project in three technology classrooms. Activities that use models are important for students’ development of knowledge and skills connected to the design process. Nevertheless, few empirical studies have thus far examined how models and modelling are used in a classroom environment when students and teachers are involved in a design project. In order to meet our aim, we video-recorded eight lessons from three different technology classrooms (students aged 13–15), where the students were involved in different problem-solving activities using models and modelling. The three projects had different specifications, and the students’ degrees of freedom thereby varied. The video recordings were analysed using a qualitative content analysis. The analysis resulted in seven activities being identified where the teachers and students talked about models and modelling in order to solve the problem. The results also revealed three different dimensions of models: material, structure and function. These dimensions are present in almost all activities that use models. In a project with a high degree of freedom, all three dimensions of models are present. On the contrary, in a project with a lower freedom, only one of the dimensions is present, resulting in a lower degree of complexity for the students. The study emphasizes that the presumptions and openness of a design project in technology education can provide different possibilities for students learning in relation to models and modelling.