Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs1–3) are useful in disease modeling and drug discovery, and they promise to provide a new generation of cell-based therapeutics. To date there has been no systematic evaluation of the most widely used techniques for generating integration-free hiPSCs. Here we compare Sendai-viral (SeV)4, episomal (Epi)5 and mRNA transfection mRNA6 methods using a number of criteria. All methods generated high-quality hiPSCs, but significant differences existed in aneuploidy rates, reprogramming efficiency, reliability and workload. We discuss the advantages and shortcomings of each approach, and present and review the results of a survey of a large number of human reprogramming laboratories on their independent experiences and preferences. Our analysis provides a valuable resource to inform the use of specific reprogramming methods for different laboratories and different applications, including clinical translation.
We report the clinical presentation and management of 34 patients with a histologically proven chordoma, treated in the neurosurgical departments in Edinburgh and Dundee, over the past 50 years. Although these tumors are commonly regarded as being locally invasive with a variable, but generally slow growth rate, they can metastasize, and this may precede surgical intervention, as in one of our patients. Our cases are compared to those in previously published series, and a comprehensive review of the treatment modalities for tumors at various sites is presented. The optimal treatment to be recommended from our own experience, and that of others, is aggressive operation and radiotherapy. A combination of hyperthermia and chemotherapy has shown some promise, but remains untested, and highlights the need for a multicenter trial with long follow-up to allow the evaluation of new therapeutic approaches.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.