In 1988, the Florida legislature passed a bill directing the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to investigate the feasibility and potential use of ground tire rubber (GTR) in asphalt-concrete mixtures. To address this legislative mandate, the FDOT planned and constructed three test projects to define performance that would allow for rational decisions about the use of GTR in Florida. A major finding of a 10-year performance evaluation of these test sites is that the wet process addition of rubber improved the crack resistance of surface mixtures. State Road 16 test sections with wet process rubberized mixes showed about 1 to 6 percent cracked areas, depending on the amount of rubber, whereas those with virgin asphalt or dry-mixed asphalt rubber showed about 30 percent cracked areas. In addition, the cracking data collected during this evaluation appear to suggest that an effective optimum rubber content is within the 10 to 15 percent range. The long-term performance evaluation program of the three test projects is described here and its findings are discussed.
Dual tires have traditionally been used to limit pavement damage by efficiently distributing axle loads over a larger contact area than single tires. However, in recent years, the trucking industry, stating economic and safety benefits, has promoted the use of wide-base single tires. The Super Single tire, an early type of wide-base tire, proved inadequate and induced excessive pavement damage. By contrast, the new generation wide-base tires have contact areas that approach those of dual tires and offer the potential for improved performance. The Florida Department of Transportation investigated the pavement damage potential of four tire types, including a conventional dual tire (11R22.5), a Super Single (425/65R22.5), and two newly designed wide-base single tires (445/50R22.5 and 455/55R22.5 respectively). A controlled accelerated pavement testing program, in addition to theoretical modeling, was performed to determine critical pavement response parameters. Pavement damage was measured in terms of rutting and fatigue cracking (bottom-up or top-down), the predominant distresses in Florida. The investigation revealed that the 455-mm wide-base tire performed as well as the dual tire. By comparison, the 445-mm wide-base tire was shown to create more rut damage on a dense-graded pavement surface and was predicted to create more bottom-up cracking than a dual tire. As expected, the Super Single induced the most damage to the pavement.
Trichloroethylene is a solvent currently used by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and many state highway agencies for separation of asphalt binders from asphalt paving mixtures in their quality control programs. However, it has been proved that trichloroethylene contributes to ozone depletion, and it is also known to be a carcinogen. The goal of the present study was to determine whether a more environmentally sound and less hazardous solvent could be used for this purpose. The solvent investigated is an n-propyl bromide with the trade name EnSolv. Preliminary studies show that it is safer than many other solvents available today. The study was performed to determine whether EnSolv could be a substitute for trichloroethylene without changing current testing methods. The tests performed included the asphalt solubility test, extraction and recovery of asphalt binders from mixtures, and penetration and viscosity tests with the recovered binders. The results of the study showed that EnSolv could be a suitable replacement for trichloroethylene. In addition, EnSolv could also be recycled and reused in the extraction and recovery procedures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.