One of the earliest events in the Myxococcus xanthus developmental cycle is production of an extracellular cell density signal called A-signal (or A-factor). Previously, we showed that cells carrying an insertion in the asgE gene fail to produce normal levels of this cell-cell signal. In this study we found that expression of asgE is growth phase regulated and developmentally regulated. Several lines of evidence indicate that asgE is cotranscribed with an upstream gene during development. Using primer extension analyses, we identified two 5 ends for this developmental transcript. The DNA sequence upstream of one 5 end has similarity to the promoter regions of several genes that are A-signal dependent, whereas sequences located upstream of the second 5 end show similarity to promoter elements identified for genes that are C-signal dependent. Consistent with this result is our finding that mutants failing to produce A-signal or C-signal are defective for developmental expression of asgE. In contrast to developing cells, the large majority of the asgE transcript found in vegetative cells appears to be monocistronic. This finding suggests that asgE uses different promoters for expression during vegetative growth and development. Growth phase regulation of asgE is abolished in a relA mutant, indicating that this vegetative promoter is induced by starvation. The data presented here, in combination with our previous results, indicate that the level of AsgE in vegetative cells is sufficient for this protein to carry out its function during development.

Acetylcholine mediates cell-to-cell communications in the skin. Human epidermal keratinocytes respond to acetylcholine via two classes of cell-surface receptors, the nicotinic and the muscarinic cholinergic receptors. High affinity muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) have been found on keratinocyte cell surfaces at high density. These receptors mediate effects of muscarinic drugs on keratinocyte viability, proliferation, adhesion, lateral migration, and differentiation. In this study, we investigated the molecular structure of keratinocyte mAChR and their location in human epidermis. Polymerase chain reaction amplification of cDNA sequences uniquely present within the third cytoplasmic loop of each subtype demonstrated the expression of the m1, m3, m4, and m5 mAChR subtypes. To visualize these mAChR, we raised rabbit anti-sera to synthetic peptide analogs of the carboxyl terminal regions of each subtype. The antibodies selectively bound to keratinocyte mAChR subtypes in immunoblotting membranes and epidermis, both of which could be abolished by preincubating the anti-serum with the peptide used for immunization. The immunofluorescent staining patterns produced by each antibody in the epidermis suggested that the profile of keratinocyte mAChR changes during epidermal turnover. The semiquantitative analysis of fluorescence revealed that basal cells predominantly expressed m3, prickle cells had equally high levels of m4 and m5, and granular cells mostly possessed m1. Thus, the results of this study demonstrate for the first time the presence of m1, m3, m4, and m5 mAChR in epidermal keratinocytes. Because keratinocytes express a unique combination of mAChR subtypes at each stage of their development in the epidermis, each receptor may regulate a specific cell function. Hence, a single cytotransmitter, acetylcholine, and muscarinic drugs may exert different biologic effects on keratinocytes at different stages of their maturation.

The responder community must be ready to respond quickly and effectively in the event of a disaster. In order to maintain readiness, many disaster response communities exercise their response capabilities on a regular basis. The critical challenge is to design, conduct, and evaluate exercises in a manner that effectively tests responders’ readiness and generates lessons that can improve readiness. This paper describes a framework to enable assessment of response readiness through evaluation of critical capabilities in exercises. It was developed for oil spill response based on the observation and analysis of four response exercises. The framework (1) identifies critical capabilities that lead to readiness for spill response, and maps them to (2) exercise design components that test each capability and (3) evaluation measures to evaluate each capability within an exercise. The framework enables continuous improvement by linking the evaluation of exercises to the critical capabilities required of an oil spill response organization; by evaluating the performance of specific capabilities, areas for improvement are clearly identified and can be re-tested in a future exercise. While the findings are necessarily specific to oil spill response, the principles apply to any disaster response context.

No abstract

No abstract