Background: Low blood glucose in newborns is difficult to detect clinically. Hence a reliable ''point of care'' device (glucometer) for early detection and treatment of low glucose is needed. Objective: To evaluate the performance of five readily available glucometers for the detection of low blood glucose in newborn infants. Method: Glucostix measurements were taken for newborns with risk factors using a Reflolux S (Boehringer) glucometer. If the initial reading was low (, 2.6 mmol/l), further measurements were taken with two other glucometers (phase I, Advantage and Glucotrend (Roche); phase II, Elite XL (Bayer) and Precision (Abbott)), and plasma glucose was measured in the laboratory (Aeroset; Abbott). Results: Over 10 months, 101 specimens were collected from 71 newborns (57 in phase I; 44 in phase II). The Advantage glucometer usually overestimated blood glucose with a mean difference of 1.07 mmol/l (p , 0.01) at all low glucose ranges. The Glucotrend, Precision, and Elite XL glucometers performed better; the mean differences were not significantly different from the laboratory measured value (0.17 mmol/l (p = 0.37); 20.12 mmol/l (p = 0.13), and 0.24 mmol/l (p = 0.13) respectively). For detection of glucose concentrations , 2.6 mmol/l, the Precision glucometer had the highest sensitivity (96.4%) and negative predictive value (90%). For lower glucose concentrations (, 2.0 mmol/l), the Glucotrend glucometer performed even better (sensitivity 92.3%, negative predictive value 96.3%). Conclusion: Point of care devices should have good precision in the low glucose concentration range, sensitivity, and accuracy for early detection of neonatal hypoglycaemia. None of the five glucometers was satisfactory as the sole measuring device. The Glucotrend and Precision glucometers have the greatest sensitivity and negative predictive value. However, confirmation with laboratory measurements of plasma glucose and clinical assessment are still of the utmost importance.

Background The sensitivity to endocrine therapy assay (SET2,3) predicts treatment outcomes in Stage II-III breast cancer. SET2,3 measures transcription related to estrogen and progesterone receptors (SETER/PR index) and the molecular subtype (RNA4: ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, AURKA) from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections. Methods We designed a nested study across 3 pathology laboratories, each testing 60 breast cancers twice in controlled batches. Laboratories macrodissected and directly homogenized the unstained FFPE tumor sections, then performed the QuantiGene Plex bead-based hybridization assay. SET2,3 was calculated centrally using predefined statistical R-scripts and applying pre-defined cutpoints. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated from continuous measurements and Kappa statistic from categorical results. A mixed-effects model estimated contributions to bias (fixed effects) and variance (random effects) from the replicated design. Results Intralaboratory (CCC 0.96–0.99) and interlaboratory (CCC 0.98–0.99) SET2,3 results were concordant, with rates of agreement for high/low categorization within (Kappa 0.83–0.93) and between laboratories (Kappa 0.87–0.88). The relative contributions to overall variance of SET2,3 measurements were 96.90% from biological differences between cancers, 0.67% from interlaboratory variability, and 2.44% from residual causes including intralaboratory replicates. Similar results were obtained with SETER/PR, the baseline prognostic index calculated using pathological or clinical tumor and nodal staging information, and the 4 individual genes (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and AURKA). Conclusion Intra- and interpathology laboratory measurements of SET2,3 and its components were highly reproducible when tested from FFPE tumor sections.