1. The flow regime is a primary determinant of the structure and function of aquatic and riparian ecosystems for streams and rivers. Hydrologic alteration has impaired riverine ecosystems on a global scale, and the pace and intensity of human development greatly exceeds the ability of scientists to assess the effects on a river-by-river basis. Current scientific understanding of hydrologic controls on riverine ecosystems and experience gained from individual river studies support development of environmental flow standards at the regional scale. 2. This paper presents a consensus view from a group of international scientists on a new framework for assessing environmental flow needs for many streams and rivers simultaneously to foster development and implementation of environmental flow standards at the regional scale. This framework, the ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA), is a synthesis of a number of existing hydrologic techniques and environmental flow methods that are currently being used to various degrees and that can support comprehensive regional flow management. The flexible approach allows

[1] River restoration is at the forefront of applied hydrologic science. However, many river restoration projects are conducted with minimal scientific context. We propose two themes around which a research agenda to advance the scientific basis for river restoration can be built. First, because natural variability is an inherent feature of all river systems, we hypothesize that restoration of process is more likely to succeed than restoration aimed at a fixed end point. Second, because physical, chemical, and biological processes are interconnected in complex ways across watersheds and across timescales, we hypothesize that restoration projects are more likely to be successful in achieving goals if undertaken in the context of entire watersheds. To achieve restoration objectives, the science of river restoration must include (1) an explicit recognition of the known complexities and uncertainties, (2) continued development of a theoretical framework that enables us to identify generalities among river systems and to ask relevant questions, (3) enhancing the science and use of restoration monitoring by measuring the most effective set of variables at the correct scales of measurement, (4) linking science and implementation, and (5) developing methods of restoration that are effective within existing constraints. Key limitations to river restoration include a lack of scientific knowledge of watershed-scale process dynamics, institutional structures that are poorly suited to large-scale adaptive management, and a lack of political support to reestablish delivery of the ecosystem amenities lost through river degradation. This paper outlines an approach for addressing these shortcomings.

No abstract

Although the gross morphology of amyloid fibrils is fairly well understood, very little is known about how the constituent polypeptides fold within the amyloid folding motif. In the experiments reported here, we used trypsin and chymotrypsin to conduct limited proteolysis studies on synthetic amyloid fibrils composed of the Alzheimer's disease peptide Abeta(1-40). In both reactions, the extreme N-terminal proteolytic fragment is released from fibrils as rapidly as it is from the Abeta monomer, while other proteolytic fragments are generated much more slowly. Furthermore, aggregated material isolated by centrifugation of intermediate digestion time points from both proteases contains, in addition to full-length material, peptides that possess mature C-termini but truncated N-termini. These data strongly suggest that the N-terminal region of Abeta is not involved in the beta-sheet network of the amyloid fibril, while the C-terminus is essentially completely engaged in protective-presumably beta-sheet-structure. In both digests, release of the extreme N-terminal fragments of Abeta(1-40) reaches plateau values corresponding to about 80% of the total available Abeta. This suggests that there are two classes of peptides in the fibril: while the majority of Abeta molecules have an exposed N-terminus, about 20% of the peptides have an N-terminus that is protected from proteolysis within the fibril structure. The most likely cause of this heterogeneity is the lateral association of protofilaments into the fibril structure, which would be expected to generate a unique environment for those Abeta N-termini located at protofilament packing interfaces and/or in the interior core region between the packed protofilaments. This suggests that the N-terminal region of Abeta, while not directly involved in the beta-sheet network of the fibril, may contribute to fibril stability by participating in protofilament packing.