The aim of this study was to determine whether hemorrhage affects the levels of a variety of stress-related proteins and whether changes can be inhibited by drugs reported to provide protection from ischemia and reperfusion injury. Male Swiss Webster mice were subjected to a 40% hemorrhage without resuscitation. Western blot analysis indicated that c-Jun (an AP-1 protein), Kruppel-like factor 6 (KFL6), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) were upregulated sequentially in that order. Pretreatment of mice with geldanamycin (GA) 16 h before hemorrhage effectively inhibited the expression of the proteins KLF6 and iNOS, whereas caffeic acid phenethyl ester did not. GA pretreatment increased inducible heat shock protein (HSP) 70 but not HSP90 in both sham and hemorrhagic tissues. The overexpressed inducible HSP70 formed complexes with KLF6 and iNOS. These results suggest that GA may be therapeutically useful for reducing hemorrhage-induced injury when used as a presurgical treatment or when added to resuscitation fluids.
BackgroundComorbid depression is a significant challenge for safety-net primary care systems. Team-based collaborative depression care is effective, but complex system factors in safety-net organizations impede adoption and result in persistent disparities in outcomes. Diabetes-Depression Care-management Adoption Trial (DCAT) evaluated whether depression care could be significantly improved by harnessing information and communication technologies to automate routine screening and monitoring of patient symptoms and treatment adherence and allow timely communication with providers.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare 6-month outcomes of a technology-facilitated care model with a usual care model and a supported care model that involved team-based collaborative depression care for safety-net primary care adult patients with type 2 diabetes.MethodsDCAT is a translational study in collaboration with Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, the second largest safety-net care system in the United States. A comparative effectiveness study with quasi-experimental design was conducted in three groups of adult patients with type 2 diabetes to compare three delivery models: usual care, supported care, and technology-facilitated care. Six-month outcomes included depression and diabetes care measures and patient-reported outcomes. Comparative treatment effects were estimated by linear or logistic regression models that used generalized propensity scores to adjust for sampling bias inherent in the nonrandomized design.ResultsDCAT enrolled 1406 patients (484 in usual care, 480 in supported care, and 442 in technology-facilitated care), most of whom were Hispanic or Latino and female. Compared with usual care, both the supported care and technology-facilitated care groups were associated with significant reduction in depressive symptoms measured by scores on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (least squares estimate, LSE: usual care=6.35, supported care=5.05, technology-facilitated care=5.16; P value: supported care vs usual care=.02, technology-facilitated care vs usual care=.02); decreased prevalence of major depression (odds ratio, OR: supported care vs usual care=0.45, technology-facilitated care vs usual care=0.33; P value: supported care vs usual care=.02, technology-facilitated care vs usual care=.007); and reduced functional disability as measured by Sheehan Disability Scale scores (LSE: usual care=3.21, supported care=2.61, technology-facilitated care=2.59; P value: supported care vs usual care=.04, technology-facilitated care vs usual care=.03). Technology-facilitated care was significantly associated with depression remission (technology-facilitated care vs usual care: OR=2.98, P=.04); increased satisfaction with care for emotional problems among depressed patients (LSE: usual care=3.20, technology-facilitated care=3.70; P=.05); reduced total cholesterol level (LSE: usual care=176.40, technology-facilitated care=160.46; P=.01); improved satisfaction with diabetes care (LSE: usual care=4.01, techn...
Infiltration of leukocytes into glomerular and interstitial regions of the kidney is a key event in the pathogenesis of human glomerulonephritis. This process is mediated by specific adhesion molecules, some of which are expressed in a coordinated fashion following endothelial cell activation. We have assessed the pattern of expression of the selectins (E, P and L), and the counter-receptors (LFA-1 and ICAM-1, and VLA-4 and VCAM-1 in 119 renal biopsies using sequential sections, and have correlated this with the degree of histological damage (tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis) and the intensity of the macrophage infiltrate. Sections were stained with the monoclonal antibodies using a standard alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP) technique. There were strong correlations between the following: (1) expression of LFA-1, VLA-4, and L-selectin in the periglomerular region, interstitium and in focal interstitial infiltrates and the presence of macrophages in these regions; (2) de novo tubular expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1; (3) staining for ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on focal cellular infiltrates within the interstitium; and (4) staining for E- and P-selectin on extraglomerular endothelium. These are also strongly correlated with the degree of chronic histological damage. There was, however, no correlation between glomerular expression of adhesion molecules or glomerular macrophage infiltration and chronic histological damage. Although expression of VCAM-1 by the glomerular mesangium was strongly correlated with the presence of cells staining for VLA-4 within the glomerulus, glomerular expression of adhesion molecules correlated poorly with their expression in other sites. These results show that coordinated up-regulation of adhesion molecule expression in the tubulointerstitium is associated with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and may contribute, therefore, to the progression of renal disease.
PurposeWe investigated dimensions of low-income minority patient engagement in the context of diabetes-depression care-management with automated telephone assessment (ATA) calls as a facilitator.MethodsMixed method analyses (including regression analyses and coding of interviews) were used to examine patient engagement with technology, assess its impact on health outcomes and satisfaction with care, and analyze barriers to engagement. Patient engagement was measured by analyzing patient’s ATA call response rates. We then evaluated those results in the context of the outcomes of the broader clinical trial, which compared three study arms. ResultsAverage completed call rate throughout the study is about 50 % and decreases after 6 months. The biggest barrier to patient engagement is timing. Patient engagement levels differ by baseline depression status and have no significant effect on health outcomes and satisfaction with care at 6, 12, and 18 months. However, from the preliminary clinical trial results, the arm in which the ATA system is implemented has higher satisfaction with depression care than the two control arms. Thus, it is more likely that technology positively affects satisfaction with depression care outcomes through provider engagement rather than patient engagement.ConclusionsThe study’s patient engagement results and identified barriers would be useful to aid the design and implementation of future automated screening and monitoring systems to optimize patient engagement. The results also suggest that implementing a technology-supported care-management might not result in outcome disparities among patients with different levels of patient engagement.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0900-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.