Background The benefits of preoperative perforator imaging for microsurgical reconstruction have been well established in the literature. Methods An extensive literature review was performed to determine the most commonly used modalities, and their applicability, advantages and disadvantages. Results The review demonstrated varioius findings including decreases in operative time and cost with the use of CT angiography to identification of perforators for inclusion in flap design with hand-held Doppler ultrasound. Modalities like MR angiography offer alternatives for patients with contrast allergies or renal dysfunction while maintaining a high level of clarity and fidelity. Although the use of conventional angiography has decreased due to the availability of less invasive alternatives, it continues to serve a role in the preoperative evaluation of patients for lower extremity reconstruction. Duplex ultrasonography has been of great interest recently as an inexpensive, risk free, and extraordinarily accurate diagnostic tool. Emerging technologies such as indocyanine green fluorescence angiography and dynamic infrared thermography provide real-time information about tissue vascularity and perfusion without requiring radiation exposure. Conclusion This article presents an in-depth review of the various imaging modalities available to reconstructive surgeons and includes hand held Doppler ultrasound, CT angiography, MR angiography, conventional angiography, duplex ultrasonography, Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography and Dynamic Infrared Thermography.
Background Deep sternal wound complications following sternotomy represent a complex challenge. Management can involve debridement, flap reconstruction, and rigid sternal fixation (RSF). We present our 11-year experience in the surgical treatment of deep sternal wound dehiscence using a standardized treatment algorithm. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of all 134 cardiac patients who required operative debridement after median sternotomy at a single institution between October 2007 and March 2019. Demographics, perioperative covariates, and outcomes were recorded. Univariate and subgroup analyses were performed. Results One-hundred twelve patients (83.5%) with a deep sternal dehiscence underwent flap closure and 56 (50%) RSF. Of the patients who underwent flap closure, 87.5% received pectoralis advancement flaps. A 30-day mortality following reconstruction was 3.9%. Median length of stay after initial debridement was 8 days (interquartile range: 5–15). Of patients with flaps, 54 (48%) required multiple debridements prior to closure, and 30 (27%) underwent reoperation after flap closure. Patients who needed only a single debridement were significantly less likely to have a complication requiring reoperation (N = 10/58 vs. 20/54, 17 vs. 37%, p = 0.02), undergo a second flap (N = 6/58 vs. 17/54, 10 vs. 32%, p < 0.001), or, if plated, require removal of sternal plates (N = 6/34 vs. 11/22, 18 vs. 50%, p = 0.02). Conclusion Although sternal dehiscence remains a complex challenge, an aggressive treatment algorithm, including debridement, flap closure, and consideration of RSF, can achieve good long-term outcomes. In low-risk patients, RSF does not appear to increase the likelihood of reoperation. We hypothesize that earlier surgical intervention, before the development of systemic symptoms, may be associated with improved outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.