Twice a year, normally diurnal songbirds engage in long-distance nocturnal migrations between their wintering and breeding grounds. If and how songbirds sleep during these periods of increased activity has remained a mystery. We used a combination of electrophysiological recording and neurobehavioral testing to characterize seasonal changes in sleep and cognition in captive white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii) across nonmigratory and migratory seasons. Compared to sparrows in a nonmigratory state, migratory sparrows spent approximately two-thirds less time sleeping. Despite reducing sleep during migration, accuracy and responding on a repeated-acquisition task remained at a high level in sparrows in a migratory state. This resistance to sleep loss during the prolonged migratory season is in direct contrast to the decline in accuracy and responding observed following as little as one night of experimenter-induced sleep restriction in the same birds during the nonmigratory season. Our results suggest that despite being adversely affected by sleep loss during the nonmigratory season, songbirds exhibit an unprecedented capacity to reduce sleep during migration for long periods of time without associated deficits in cognitive function. Understanding the mechanisms that mediate migratory sleeplessness may provide insights into the etiology of changes in sleep and behavior in seasonal mood disorders, as well as into the functions of sleep itself.

Rationale-Factors that increase an individual's susceptibility to cocaine dependence remain largely unknown. We have previously shown that adult outbred male Sprague-Dawley rats can be classified as either low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively) based on their locomotor activity following administration of a single dose of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Further, LCR/HCR classification predicts dopamine transporter function/inhibition, cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization, and cocaine conditioned place preference.Objectives-The present study assessed LCR/HCR classification and the development of locomotor sensitization on the latency to acquire cocaine self-administration and motivation to selfadminister cocaine.Results-LCRs and HCRs did not differ in their latency to acquire low-dose cocaine selfadministration (0.25 mg/kg/infusion over 12 s, fixed ratio 1 schedule of reinforcement). In a followup experiment, repeated experimenter-administered injections of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in locomotor sensitization for LCRs, but not HCRs; nonetheless, all rats exhibited decreased latency to acquire cocaine self-administration compared to the first experiment. Repeated cocaine preexposure and LCR/HCR classification predicted break point when rats responded for cocaine under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement (0.25, 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg/infusion; multiple exposure > single exposure, LCR > HCR), but there was no interaction between these variables.Conclusions-Although LCR/HCR classification did not predict the rate of acquisition of cocaine self-administration under these conditions, LCR rats demonstrated greater responding for cocaine after acquisition (PR). Thus, these findings demonstrate the relevance of using the LCR/HCR model when studying susceptibility to cocaine dependence.

Cocaine addiction is a significant and complex disease. Part of this complexity is caused by the variability of the drug experience early in drug use (initial responsiveness, amount of use, etc.). In rats, individual differences in initial cocaine responsiveness and cocaine self-administration history both predict the development of cocaine sensitization, a putative mechanism contributing to the development of cocaine addiction. Here, we sought to determine the role of these factors and cocaine dose on the development of sensitization to cocaine's motivational effects during the earliest stages of self-administration. Rats were classified as either low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively) based on acute cocaine-induced locomotor activity (10 mg/kg i.p.) before learning to self-administer cocaine (0.6 mg/kg/infusion i.v.) under a fixed ratio 1 (FR1) schedule of reinforcement. After acquisition, rats self-administered cocaine (0.6 or 1.2 mg/kg/infusion) under a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement either immediately or after an additional five FR1 sessions (0.6 or 1.2 mg/kg/infusion). No LCR/HCR differences in sensitization were observed. However, regardless of LCR/HCR classification, exposure to the higher dose of cocaine produced sensitization to cocaine's motivational effects on the PR schedule (i.e., increased break points) and an escalation of consumption on the FR schedule. Thus, our results reveal a novel model for studying escalation and sensitization very early after acquisition and suggest that sensitization may be important in the earliest stages of the cocaine addiction process.

Rationale We have previously described a model in which adult outbred male Sprague-Dawley rats are classified as either low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively) based on acute cocaine-induced open-field activation. This model revealed important individual differences in cocaine’s effects, including that LCRs exhibited greater responding than HCRs on a progressive-ratio schedule of cocaine reinforcement. However, no LCR/HCR differences in acquisition of cocaine self-administration (0.25 mg/kg/12 s infusion) were observed under these conditions. Objectives To determine if LCRs and HCRs differ in the effectiveness of cocaine to function as a reinforcer under a broader range of conditions, the present study assessed the acquisition of cocaine self-administration (fixed ratio 1 schedule of reinforcement) as a function of i.v. cocaine dose (0.1875, 0.375, 0.5, 1, or 1.5 mg/kg/6 s infusion). Results LCRs and HCRs did not differ significantly on any measure of acquisition examined, including day to meet acquisition criterion, percent acquired, and cocaine intake. The effect of dose on percent acquired and rate of acquisition peaked at the 1 mg/kg/infusion dose of cocaine. In contrast, the effect of dose on cocaine intake was linear, with the highest rate of intake occurring at the 1.5 mg/kg/infusion dose of cocaine. Conclusions LCRs and HCRs do not appear to differ in their acquisition of cocaine reinforced operant responding across a range of cocaine doses, including conditions that lead to high levels of cocaine intake.

Sex and individual differences are important considerations when studying cocaine responsiveness. We have previously shown that male Sprague-Dawley (S-D) rats can be classified as low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively) based on their locomotor activity following a single dose of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Further, this distinction was found to predict dopamine transporter function, cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization, cocaine conditioned place preference and motivation to self-administer cocaine. Here we investigated whether or not individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor activity and locomotor sensitization exist in female S-D rats. Female rats exhibited a broad range of locomotor activation following either a 5 or 10 mg/kg cocaine injection, allowing for classification as LCRs or HCRs. When administered over 7 days, both doses induced locomotor sensitization in female LCRs/HCRs. However, the magnitude of effects produced by 5 mg/kg cocaine in female LCRs/HCRs was more comparable to that produced by 10 mg/kg in male LCRs/HCRs, both of which, interestingly, developed sensitization in this study. These findings suggest that female S-D rats, like male S-D rats, can be classified as LCRs/HCRs and highlight the importance of accounting for dose when studying sex and individual differences to the effects of cocaine.