No abstract

PurposeAlthough patients with incurable disease and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS ≥ 2) are underrepresented in clinical trials, they are frequently offered palliative chemotherapy (pCT) in daily clinical practice in order to improve symptoms and quality of life. In this case-control retrospective analysis, our goal was to identify factors associated with poorer survival and lack of benefit of pCT in this population.Patients and methodsWe evaluated 2,514 patients who died between August 2011 and July 2012 in an academic cancer care institution and its hospice. A total of 301 patients with solid tumours and ECOG-PS ≥ 2 at prescription of pCT were selected for this case-control retrospective analysis. Cases were defined as patients who survived less than 90 days after the first cycle of first line pCT, and controls were those who had a longer survival.Results142 cases and 159 controls were included. Cases were more likely to experience grade ≥ 3 toxicity (43% versus 28%; p = 0.005), die of toxicity (16% versus 6%; p < 0.001) and not be offered best supportive care (BSC) only (47% versus 71%; p < 0.001). Median overall survival was 204 among controls and 34 days in cases (hazard ratio = 0.177; 95%, confidence interval = 0.015–0.033, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified ECOG-PS > 2 (odds ratio (OR) = 2.3, p = 0.044) and serum creatinine (sCr) > 1 mg/dL (OR = 11.2, p < 0.001) as independent predictors of 90-day mortality.ConclusionsThe independent predictors of short survival (less than 3 months) after initiation of pCT in this population were ECOG-PS > 2 and elevated sCr. Therefore, patient selection is crucial, as pCT may be deleterious in ECOG-PS ≥ 2 pts.

These results indicate that MHD patients with a lower level of acceptance of fluid restriction have poorer HRQOL, particularly in mental domains of HRQOL. The high prevalence of poor acceptance of fluid restriction in the present study underscores the need for interventions to improve acceptance of fluid restriction and determine if such interventions improve HRQOL of MHD patients with very low urine volume.

The role of antiepileptic drugs (AED) prophylaxis in primary brain tumor (PBT) seizure-naïve patients remains unclear. Additionally, AED are associated with severe side effects, negative impact on cognition and drug interactions. Little is known about current practice regarding prophylactic AED use in PBT. We investigated its use in a tertiary care cancer center. We reviewed medical records of 260 patients registered in our center between 2008 and 2012, focusing on prophylactic AED use. A descriptive analysis was performed with SPSS IBM version 20.0. Median age was 44.5 years (11-83). Most patients had ECOG PS ≤1 (76.4 %). Among 141 seizure-naïve patients, 70.2 % received an AED as primary prophylaxis (PP). Most commonly used drugs as PP were phenytoin (85.9 %), carbamazepine (6.1 %) and phenobarbital (5.1 %). In only 14 patients (14.1 %) AEDs were eventually discontinued, in a median time of 5.9 months (1.1-76.8 m). AED were used as PP in 60 % of low-grade gliomas, 73.3 % of anaplastic gliomas and 93.9 % of glioblastoma patients. Twenty-seven patients (27.3 %) on PP presented seizures, generally associated with tumor progression. Of the 42 seizure-naïve patients not receiving AED prophylaxis, only two presented seizures, which occurred during or within the first week post-radiotherapy. In this cross-sectional study, prophylactic AED use in PBT was extremely high. Postoperatively, AED were discontinued in a minority of patients, mostly after a prolonged period. Current prophylactic AED use patterns in PBT are not in accordance with established guidelines.