Chlorpheniramine (CPAM) is a chiral antihistaminic drug commercialized as a racemic mixture. The intestinal absorption and metabolism of CPAM have been investigated in rat using in vivo (oral and IV administration), in situ (intestinal loop model), and in vitro (everted sac model) experiments. Oral and IV administrations of 20 mg/kg of the racemic mixture show that the pharmacokinetics of CPAM are stereoselective, with higher AUCs for the (+)-S-enantiomer compared to its antipode. The monodesmethyl metabolite (DCPM) was quantifiable in blood and its pharmacokinetics are stereoselective after oral but not after IV administration. Experiments using intestinal loops and everted sacs showed that the absorption is not stereoselective and that in vivo stereoselective formation of DCPM is presumably due to stereoselective hepatic metabolism. Moreover, the in vitro and in situ absorption of CPAM are not modified by modulators of P-glycoprotein and cytochromes P450 (cyclosporin A, ketoconazole).

Chlorpheniramine (chlorphenamine, CPAM) is a racemic antihistaminic H1 drug containing two enantiomers. The aim of this study was to assess the bioequivalence of two formulations (reference and Vietnamese-tested formulation) of racemic chlorpheniramine combined with phenylpropanolamine in an open-labeled, randomized, crossover two-period study, after administration of 8 mg of racemic chlorpheniramine in 12 healthy Vietnamese subjects. First, dissolution of both formulations was tested in vitro according to USP requirements. Then the 12 subjects received both formulations after an overnight fast and a 7-day wash-out period. Plasma samples were collected up to 168 h. Plasma concentrations of total chlorpheniramine and its individual enantiomers were determined with a validated chiral HPLC method and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using model-independent analysis. For the reference formulation, Cmax and AUC values were higher for (+)S-chlorpheniramine ((+)S-CPAM) compared to (-)R-chlorpheniramine ((-)R-CPAM) (13.3 vs. 6.8 ng/ml and 409 vs. 222 ng/ml/h, respectively) while Clt/F and Vd/F were lower (9.8 vs. 17.6 l/h and 321 vs. 627 l, respectively). No difference was observed for Tmax, t(1/2), and MRT. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for the reference and the Vietnamese-tested formulation. Bioequivalence was assessed by Schuirmann test, as recommended by the current FDA and European Community criteria. Dissolution tests showed that both formulations were equivalent. A nonstereospecific, but not a stereospecific, approach indicated bioequivalence between the formulations.

No abstract