The reliability of radiomics features (RFs) is crucial for quantifying tumour heterogeneity. We assessed the influence of imaging, segmentation, and processing conditions (quantization range, bin number, signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], and unintended outliers) on RF measurement. Low SNR and unintended outliers increased the standard deviation and mean values of histograms to calculate the first-order RFs. Variations in imaging processing conditions significantly altered the shape of the probability distribution (centre of distribution, extent of dispersion, and segmentation of probability clusters) in second-order RF matrices (i.e. grey-level co-occurrence and grey-level run length), thereby eventually causing fluctuations in RF estimation. Inconsistent imaging and processing conditions decreased the number of reliably measured RFs in terms of individual RF values (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.75) and inter-lesion RF ratios (coefficient of variation <15%). No RF could be reliably estimated under inconsistent SNR and inclusion of outlier conditions. By contrast, with high SNR and no outliers, all first-order RFs, 11 (42%) grey-level co-occurrence RFs and five (42%) grey-level run length RFs showed acceptable reliability. Our study suggests that optimization of SNR, exclusion of outliers, and application of relevant quantization range and bin number should be performed to ensure the robustness of radiomics studies assessing tumor heterogeneity.

ObjectiveThis study was designed to develop an automated system for quantification of various regional disease patterns of diffuse lung diseases as depicted on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and to compare the performance of the automated system with human readers.Materials and MethodsA total of 600 circular regions-of-interest (ROIs), 10 pixels in diameter, were utilized. The 600 ROIs comprised 100 ROIs that represented six typical regional patterns (normal, ground-glass opacity, reticular opacity, honeycombing, emphysema, and consolidation). The ROIs were used to train the automated classification system based on the use of a Support Vector Machine classifier and 37 features of texture and shape. The performance of the classification system was tested with a 5-fold cross-validation method. An automated quantification system was developed with a moving ROI in the lung area, which helped classify each pixel into six categories. A total of 92 HRCT images obtained from patients with different diseases were used to validate the quantification system. Two radiologists independently classified lung areas of the same CT images into six patterns using the manual drawing function of dedicated software. Agreement between the automated system and the readers and between the two individual readers was assessed.ResultsThe overall accuracy of the system to classify each disease pattern based on the typical ROIs was 89%. When the quantification results were examined, the average agreement between the system and each radiologist was 52% and 49%, respectively. The agreement between the two radiologists was 67%.ConclusionAn automated quantification system for various regional patterns of diffuse interstitial lung diseases can be used for objective and reproducible assessment of disease severity.