Middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) models have become well established as the most suitable way to simulate stroke in experimental studies. The high variability in the size of the resulting infarct due to filament composition, rodent strain and vessel anatomy makes the setup of such models very complex. Beside controllable variables of homeostasis, the choice of anesthetics and the grade of ischemia and reperfusion played a major role for extent of neurological injury. Transient MCAO was induced during either isoflurane or ketamine/xylazine (ket/xyl) anesthesia with simultaneously measurement of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in 60 male Wistar rats (380-420 g). Neurological injury was quantified after 24 h. Isoflurane compared with ket/xyl improved mortality 24 h after MCAO (10 vs. 50 %, p = 0.037) and predominantly led to striatal infarcts (78 vs. 18 %, p = 0.009) without involvement of the neocortex and medial caudoputamen. Independent of anesthesia type, cortical infarcts could be predicted with a sensitivity of 67 % and a specificity of 100 % if CBF did not exceed 35 % of the baseline value during ischemia. In all other cases, cortical infarcts developed if the reperfusion values remained below 50 %. Hyperemia during reperfusion significantly increased infarct and edema volumes. The cause of frequent striatal infarcts after isoflurane anesthesia might be attributed to an improved CBF during ischemia (46 ± 15 % vs. 35 ± 19 %, p = 0.04). S-100β release, edema volume and upregulation of IL-6 and IL-1β expression were impeded by isoflurane. Thus, anesthetic management as well as the grade of ischemia and reperfusion after transient MCAO demonstrated important effects on neurological injury.

BackgroundNeuroprotective strategies in ischemic stroke are an important challenge in clinical and experimental research as an adjunct to reperfusion therapy that may reduce neurologic injury and improve outcome. The neuroprotective properties of levosimendan in traumatic brain injury in vitro, transient global brain ischemia and focal spinal cord ischemia suggest the potential for similar effects in transient brain ischemia.MethodsTransient brain ischemia was induced for 60 min by intraluminal occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in 40 male Wistar rats under general anesthesia with s-ketamine and xylazine and with continuous monitoring of their blood pressure and cerebral perfusion. Five minutes before inducing reperfusion, a levosimendan bolus (24 μg kg -1) was administered over a 20 minute period. Infarct size, brain swelling, neurological function and the expression of inflammatory markers were quantified 24 hours after reperfusion.ResultsAlthough levosimendan limited the infarct size and brain swelling by 40% and 53%, respectively, no effect on neurological outcome or mortality could be demonstrated. Upregulation of tumor necrosis factor α and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 was significantly impeded. Cerebral blood flow during reperfusion was significantly reduced as a consequence of sustained autoregulation.ConclusionsLevosimendan demonstrated significant neuroprotective properties in a rat model of transient brain ischemia by reducing reperfusion injury.

Cerebral injuries can trigger stress-related cardiomyopathy. The extent of cerebral injury and the involvement of the insular cortex influence the incidence and extent of myocardial injury (MI), and drugs with proven neuroprotective and cardioprotective properties such as levosimendan might be beneficial. This hypothesis was addressed in a rat model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Transient brain ischemia was induced for 60 min by intraluminal occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in 40 male Wistar rats. Treatment with levosimendan (24 µg/kg) was started briefly before reperfusion. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded and cerebral and MI quantified after 24 h. Levosimendan treatment significantly reduced cerebral infarct size in the cortex, but not in the striatal and insular regions. However, its effects on survival (28 vs. 45%), incidence of MI (8 vs. 33%) as indicated by a troponin I (sTnI) threshold of 4.8 µg/L and large insular infarcts of ≥10 mm(3) (23 vs. 50%) failed to reach statistical significance. Blood pressure demonstrated significant differences related to insular infarct size during reperfusion. Levosimendan demonstrated no relevant effects on markers of MI (sTnI = 1.5 ± 2.8 vs. 5.3 ± 7.2 µg/L, P = 0.121). Insular infarct size could be identified as the only predictor of MI (odds ratio = 1.86, P = 0.037). In conclusion, the current investigation confirmed insular infarct size as a predictor of MI and source of hemodynamic compromise, but failed to demonstrate an effect of levosimendan on MI trigged by brain ischemia. A hardly protectable insular region might explain this.