Polymorphism at the ADH2 and ADH3 loci of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) has been shown to have an effect on the predisposition to alcoholism in Asian individuals. However, the results are not conclusive for white individuals. We have analyzed the ADH genotype of 876 white individuals from Spain (n ؍ 251), France (n ؍ 160), Germany (n ؍ 184), Sweden (n ؍ 88), and Poland (n ؍ 193). Peripheral blood samples from healthy controls and groups of patients with viral cirrhosis and alcohol-induced cirrhosis, as well as alcoholics with no liver disease, were collected on filter paper. Genotyping of the ADH2 and ADH3 loci was performed using polymerase chain reactionrestriction fragment length polymorphism methods on white cell DNA. In healthy controls, ADH2*2 frequencies ranged from 0% (France) to 5.4% (Spain), whereas ADH3*1 frequencies ranged from 47.6% (Germany) to 62.5% (Sweden). Statistically significant differences were not found, however, between controls from different countries, nor between patients with alcoholism and/or liver disease. When all individuals were grouped in nonalcoholics (n ؍ 451) and alcoholics (n ؍ 425), ADH2*2 frequency was higher in nonalcoholics (3.8%) than in alcoholics (1.3%) (P ؍ .0016), whereas the ADH3 alleles did not show differences. Linkage disequilibrium was found between ADH2 and ADH3, resulting in an association of the alleles ADH2*2 and ADH3*1, both coding for the most active enzymatic forms. In conclusion, the ADH2*2 allele decreases the risk for alcoholism, whereas the ADH2*2 and ADH3*1 alleles are found to be associated in the European population. (HEPATOLOGY 2000;31:984-989.)Ingested alcohol is mostly metabolized in the liver by the successive action of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH). Both enzymes exhibit genetic polymorphisms that influence the rate of conversion of ethanol to acetaldehyde, and of acetaldehyde to acetate. It has been consistently reported that ALDH2 is the most important alcohol-metabolizing gene affecting predisposition to alcoholism in Asian populations. The prevalence of the ALDH2*2 allele, which codes for a physiologically inactive mitochondrial ALDH form, is lower in alcoholics than in nonalcoholics. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] However, this allele has not been found in white individuals. 21 Regarding ADH, polymorphism is detected at the ADH2 and ADH3 loci. Alleles of ADH2 found in whites and Asians are ADH2*1 and ADH2*2, which encode for the low activity (1) and high activity (2) subunits, respectively. The kcat values for the resulting dimeric isozymes are very different: 9.2 min Ϫ1 for 11 and 400 min Ϫ1 for 22. 22 The ADH2*2 frequency is much higher in Asians (60%-80%) than in whites (0%-10%). 21 ADH3 alleles are ADH3*1 and ADH3*2, which produce the ␥1 and ␥2 subunits. The ␥1␥1 isozyme (kcat ϭ 87 min Ϫ1 ) is moderately more active than the ␥2␥2 isozyme (kcat ϭ 35 min Ϫ1 ). 22 ADH3*1 frequency is about 50% to 60% in whites and higher than 90% in Asians. 3,23 ...
Possession of the fast metabolizing alleles for alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), ADH1B*2 and ADH1C*1, and the null allele for aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), ALDH2*2, results in increased acetylaldehyde levels and is hypothesized to increase the risk of head and neck cancer. To examine this association, the authors undertook a Human Genome Epidemiology review on these three genes and a pooled analysis of published studies on ADH1C. The majority of Asians had the fast ADH1B*2 and ADH1C*1 alleles, while the majority of Caucasians had the slow ADH1B*1/1 and ADH1C*1/2 genotypes. The ALDH2*2 null allele was frequently observed among Asians, though it was rarely observed in other populations. In a pooled analysis of data from seven case-control studies with a total of 1,325 cases and 1,760 controls, an increased risk of head and neck cancer was not observed for the ADH1C*1/2 genotype (odds ratio = 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.81, 1.23) or the ADH1C*1/1 genotype (odds ratio = 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.92, 1.41). Increased relative risks of head and neck cancer were reported for the ADH1B*1/1 and ALDH2*1/2 genotypes in several studies. Recommendations for future studies include larger sample sizes and incorporation of relevant ADH and ALDH genes simultaneously, as well as other genes. These considerations suggest the potential for the organization of a consortium of investigators conducting studies in this field.
In this study the GSTmu phenotype and ADH genotype at the ADH3 locus were investigated in a group of 39 alcoholic men with upper respiratory/digestive tract cancer: 21 with oropharyngeal cancer and 18 with laryngeal cancer. The results are compared with those of a control group of 37 alcoholic men without alcohol-related medical complications. Of the control subjects, 48% were found to be GSTmu deficient [GSTmu(-)] and 19% carried the ADH(3)1/ADH(3)1 genotype. In the laryngeal cancer patients, a significantly elevated frequency of both the GSTmu(-) (78%) and ADH(3)1/ADH(3)1 genotype (56%) was observed, relative to the control group. On the basis of this result, the risk of laryngeal cancer associated with the GSTmu(-) and ADH(3)1/ADH(3)1 genotypic combination within the population of alcoholics was estimated to be 12.9 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.8-92 (P < 0.01) relative to alcoholic individuals who have GSTmu [GSTmu(+)] and are not ADH(3)1/ADH(3)1. Thus, alcoholics who are GSTmu(-) and ADH(3)1/ADH(3)1 have at least an 80% greater risk of developing laryngeal cancer than alcoholics who are GSTmu(+) and who are not ADH(3)1/ADH(3)1. In addition, the oropharyngeal cancer patients had excess frequencies of both GSTmu(-) (62%) and ADH(3)1/ADH(3)1 (43%) relative to the control group, but these excess frequencies were not statistically significant. The GSTmu(-) and ADH(3)1/ADH(3)1 genotypic combination may be a constitutional risk factor for laryngeal cancer among alcoholics.
Background-Ethanol undergoes a first pass metabolism (FPM) in the stomach and liver. Gastric FPM of ethanol primarily depends on the activity of gastric alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH). In addition, the speed of gastric emptying (GE) may modulate both gastric and hepatic FPM of ethanol. Aims-To study the eVect of modulation of GE on FPM of ethanol in the stomach and liver. Methods-Sixteen volunteers (eight men and eight women) received ethanol (0.225 g/kg body weight) orally and intravenously, and the areas under the ethanol concentration time curves were determined to calculate FPM of ethanol. In seven of these subjects, FPM of ethanol was measured after the intravenous administration of 10 mg metoclopramide (MCP) and 20 mg N-butylscopolamine (NBS) in separate experiments to either accelerate or delay GE. GE was monitored sonographically by integration of the antral area of the stomach every five minutes for 90 minutes after oral ethanol intake. In addition, gastric biopsy specimens were taken to determine ADH activity and phenotype, as well as to evaluate gastric histology. Blood was also drawn for ADH genotyping. Results-GE time was significantly delayed by the administration of NBS as compared with controls (p<0.0001) and as compared with the administration of MCP (p<0.0001). This was associated with a significantly enhanced FPM of ethanol with NBS compared with MCP (p = 0.0004). A significant correlation was noted between GE time and FPM of ethanol (r = 0.43, p = 0.0407). Gastric ADH activity did not significantly correlate with FPM of ethanol. Conclusion-FPM of ethanol is strikingly modulated by the speed of GE. Delayed GE increases the time of exposure of ethanol to gastric ADH and may therefore increase gastric FPM of ethanol. In addition, hepatic FPM of ethanol may also be enhanced as the result of slower absorption of ethanol from the small intestine. Thus a knowledge of GE time is a major prerequisite for studying FPM of ethanol in humans. (Gut 1998;43:612-619) Keywords: first pass metabolism of ethanol; gastric emptying; alcohol dehydrogenase; ethanol metabolism; stomach Oral alcohol ingestion results in lower blood ethanol concentrations than are observed after the intravenous administration of an equal amount of ethanol. This phenomenon is called first pass metabolism (FPM) of ethanol, which is due, at least in part, to gastric ethanol metabolism by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH). In the stomach various ADH isoenzymes, including class I ( , ), III ( ) and IV ( ), exist.1 2 All of these ADH isoenzymes contribute to ethanol metabolism after oral alcohol intake [2][3][4][5][6] , and, as they have diVerent kinetic properties, total gastric ADH activity varies with the ethanol concentration of the alcohol beverage consumed. Although a significant correlation between gastric ADH activity and FPM of ethanol has been shown, 3 the contribution of the stomach to FPM of ethanol still remains a matter of debate, as it has been suggested that hepatic FPM of ethanol also exists, which may be influenced by, a...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.