The objectives of this study are to describe the surgical technique for simultaneous en-bloc robot-assisted radical cystectomy and nephro-ureterectomy, to report its surgical bench marks, and finally, to summarize the current evidence on the procedure. After written informed consent, we prospectively enrolled consecutive patients undergoing simultaneous en-bloc robot-assisted radical cystectomy and nephro-ureterectomy in a prospective institutional database. We performed all procedures with robotic assistance from the DaVinci Si-HD, a four-arm robotic system. Endpoints included surgery duration, estimated intra-operative blood loss, resection margins, intra-, and post-operative complications. Furthermore, we describe oncological outcome at follow-up. We conducted six (54.4 %) right-sided and five (45.5 %) left-sided nephro-ureterectomies. Urinary diversion consisted in nine (81.2 %) ureterocutaneostomies and in two (18.8 %) ileum conduits. The median surgery duration was 287 min [interquartile range (Q1-Q3) 253-328], thereof 196-min console time (Q1-Q3 158-230). The median-estimated blood loss was 235 mL (Q1-Q3 200-262). We did not register any intra-operative complications or conversions to open surgery. Post-operatively, each one patient suffered a Clavien-Dindo grade 1 (paralytic ileus), grade 2 (blood transfusion), and grade 3 complication (port hernia). After a median follow-up of 7 months (Q1-Q3 4-25), we registered one recurrence, a metachronous transitional cell cancer of the contralateral kidney 24 months after the initial procedure. En-bloc robot-assisted radical cystectomy and nephro-ureterectomy was associated with limited procedure duration, minor blood loss and satisfying intra- and post-operative outcomes.

RAPN appears to be a cost-effective mean to avoid inhospital complications; however, these results might not apply to low-volume hospitals or to other health care systems.

In this economic model based on US data, RAPN resulted in nominally lower cost but fewer perioperative complications than OPN. RAPN was not cost-effective in less experienced centres.

No abstract