Highlights  An experimental study of R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a is presented  An alternative methodology was proposed to estimate the optimal mass charge  R1234yf optimal charge was 92.2 g, about 7.8% lower than R134a  A thermal and energy comparison between R134a and R1234yf was analyzed  The TEWI analysis for the R1234yf was 1.13% higher than for R134a

No abstract

This study proposes the experimental evaluation of alternative refrigerants with low global warming potentials (GWPs) such as R1234ze(E), R513A, and the mixture R516A as a drop-in replacement for R134a in a domestic refrigerator with a volumetric capacity of 513 L. Initially, the optimal charge for each refrigerant was defined based on the minimum energy consumption of the refrigerator, then the thermal and energy performance of the refrigerator was evaluated. Finally, a total equivalent warming impact analysis (TEWI) was performed. The main results indicated that the optimal charge of the alternative refrigerants was below that corresponding to R134a (105 g), of which R516A (86 g) presented the greatest charge reduction. Regarding the average temperature of the refrigerator compartments, very adequate thermal conditions were observed; thus, the alternative refrigerants showed very similar conditions to R134a. For the coefficient of performance (COP) and considering R134a as a reference, it was observed that R513A presented the greatest reduction of around 28%, while R1234ze(E) showed an increase of 13% in relation to R134a. Finally, the TEWI analysis showed R1234ze(E) as the refrigerant with the least impact.