September 10, 1973 Industrial Relations — Unfair dismissal — Constructive unfair dismissal — Notice tendered by employee having no other option — Application for redundancy payment dismissed — Aircraft electrician contracting to work at employer's request at any station within United Kingdom — Refusal to work in Scotland — Acceptance by employer of notice terminating employment — Whether constructive unfair dismissal — Whether dismissed by reason of redundancy — Deprecation of technicalities — Industrial tribunal's duty to consider alternative view of party's contention — Redundancy Payments Act, 1965 (c. 62), s. l(2)(b) — Industrial Relations Act, 1971 (c. 72), s. 23(2).
Industrial Relations — Unfair industrial practice — Complainant — Complainant's resignation from union — Threats of industrial action by union against employers — Whether complainant had right to work — Nature of right — Industrial Relations Act, 1971 (c 72), ss. 5, 33 (3), 96 (1).
December 21, 1971 Master and Servant — Redundancy — Dismissal — Offer of re‐engagement at different premises — Offer accepted by employee — Subsequent change of mind by employee — Interview with employers — Date agreed on at interview for employee leaving — Whether employee dismissed — Whether employee terminating employment — Redundancy Payments Act, 1965 (c.62), s.3(2)(b).
December 6, 1971 Master and Servant — Redundancy — Redundancy payment — Claim by dismissed employee for compensation — Employer's payment of claim — Claim mistakenly calculated under Superannuation Act 1965 — Amount of payment identical with amount payable under Redundancy Act 1965 — Whether sum paid can be regarded as a redundancy payment — Redundancy Payments Act 1965 (c.62)s.l(1).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.