No abstract

The effects of breed, sex, and age of goats on fecal near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy-predicted percentage juniper in the diet were investigated, as were spectral differences in feces from goats differing in estimated genetic merit for juniper consumption. Eleven goats from each breed, sex, and age combination, representing 2 breeds (Angora and meat-type), 3 sex classifications (female, intact male, and castrated male), and 2 age categories [adult and kid (less than 12 mo of age)] were fed complete, pelleted rations containing 0 or 14% juniper. After 7 d on the same diet, fecal samples were collected for 3 d, and the spectra from the 3 replicate samples were averaged. Fecal samples were assigned to calibration or validation data sets. In a second experiment, Angora and meat goats with high or low estimated genetic merit for juniper consumption were fed the same diet to determine the effect of consumer group on fecal spectra. Feces were scanned in the 1,100- to 2,500-nm range with a scanning reflectance monochromator. Fecal spectra were analyzed for the difference in spectral characteristics and for differences in predicted juniper in the diet using internal and independent calibration equations. Internal calibration had a high precision (R(2) = 0.94), but the precision of independent validations (r(2) = 0.56) was low. Spectral differences were affected by diet, sex, breed, and age (P < 0.04). However, diet was the largest source of variation in spectral differences. Predicted percentage of juniper in the diet also showed that diet was the largest source of variation, accounting for 95% of the variation in predictions from internal calibrations and 51% of the variation in independent validations. Predictions from independent calibrations readily detected differences (P < 0.001) in the percentage of juniper in the 2 diets, and the predicted differences were similar to the actual differences. Predicted juniper in the diet was also affected by sex. Feces from goats from different juniper consumer groups fed a common diet were spectrally different, and the difference may have resulted from a greater intake by high- compared with low-juniper-consuming goats. Fecal near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy predictions of botanical composition of diets should be considered an interval scale of measurement.

Eight castrated male Angora goats were used in a repeated, simultaneous 4 x 4 Latin square designed experiment to evaluate metabolic and mohair responses of Angora goats to sulfate supplementation. Goats had ad libitum access to isonitrogenous diets containing a .16 (basal), .23, .29, or .34% S (DM basis), which yielded N:S ratios of 12.7, 8.3, 6.8, or 5.5:1. Feed intakes were not affected (P greater than .20) by dietary S level. Quadratic increases (P less than .05) to S supplementation were observed in grease and clean mohair production, grease and clean staple strength, and staple length. Mohair diameter, med fiber, kemp fiber, S, and cysteine contents were not affected (P greater than .05) by supplemental S. Averaged across the prefeeding, 2, 4, and 6 h postprandial sampling times, ruminal pH, ammonia N, total S, organic S, protein S, and plasma urea N and organic S concentrations were quadratically increased (P less than .05) by supplemental S. Ruminal sulfate S, total sulfide S, and plasma sulfate S were linearly increased (P less than .05) by supplemental S. Retention of N and mohair S yield exhibited quadratic increases (P less than .05), but S retention exhibited a linear increase (P less than .001) with increased S intake. Calculated by regression, the optimum dietary S concentration for maximum clean mohair production was .267% of dietary DM for a N:S ratio of 7.2:1, suggesting that the National Research Council N:S ratio of 10:1 is inadequate for Angora goats. The optimum level of digestible S was calculated to be .18% of the diet DM.

The objectives of this study were to describe and compare means and measures of variability of fiber characteristics and fiber production between genetically furred and furless rabbits and among classes of furless rabbits. An F1 generation of rabbits was produced by mating New Zealand White does to a rare, furless Mini Lop buck. All F1 offspring had normal coats of fur. Inter se random matings of the F1 stock (barring full-sibling matings) were made to produce the F2 generation that consisted of approximately 75% furred and 25% furless progeny. Furless animals were further subjectively classified into 3 distinct classes (1 to 3) having increasingly more fur. In yr 1, 17 furred and 20 furless rabbits (age 28 to 49 d) were randomly assigned to growing pens, and in yr 2, 17 additional furless and 9 additional furred rabbits were included to increase the size. After 6 wk, the rabbits were weighed, and a measured area of fur (approximately 20 cm2) was shorn from the left flank of each rabbit. This fiber was weighed and measured for staple length, fiber diameter, prickle factor (% of fibers > 30 microm in diameter), and fiber curvature. Fiber production per unit area of skin was calculated and fiber production per animal was estimated. In yr 2, all of the furless and 2 of the furred rabbits were shorn over their entire bodies to obtain direct measurements of total fur weight. Furless rabbits were 9% heavier (1,941 vs. 1,783 g of BW, P < 0.01) and produced approximately 90% less fiber per unit area of skin than furred rabbits (1.74 vs. 15.83 mg/cm2, P < 0.01). The fibers from furless rabbits were shorter (1.54 vs. 2.56 cm, P < 0.01) and coarser (15.8 vs. 14.5 microm diameter, P < 0.01) than those from furred rabbits and exhibited greater prickle factor (11.3 vs. 3.5%, P < 0.01) and curvature values (47.5 vs. 38.5 deg/mm, P < 0.01). Class 3 furless rabbits were heavier than rabbits of classes 1 and 2 (2,075 vs. 1,817 and 1,981 g of BW, respectively, P < 0.05). Means for actual total fiber production per animal for classes 1 to 3 were 0.64, 2.07, and 8.68 g, respectively, compared with 23.0 g for furred rabbits (P < 0.01). Although some similarities were present, several of the correlations involving fiber properties and BW were substantially different (e.g., BW vs. staple length and fiber diameter vs. weight of fiber per unit area) for furred and furless groups. These results, and those reported elsewhere from a series of experiments, support the potential for production of furless rabbits in arid and tropical environments.