Numerous studies have been reported that relate to the influence of cattle type on production efficiency; however, most reported studies have been concerned with output characteristics. This review concentrates on the influence of cattle type on the input requirements and more specifically, energy requirements. Data are presented that show that energy is required for maintenance, growth, gestation and lactation and requirements for each of these functions vary among cattle types. Data are presented that suggest 70 to 75% of total annual energy requirements are required for maintenance functions and variation in requirements for maintenance appear to be greater than variation in requirements for growth, gestation or lactation. In general, variation in maintenance requirements appears to be positively associated with genetic potential for measures of production, e.g., rate of growth or milk production. Reported results suggest that animals having genetic potential for high productivity may have less advantage or be at a disadvantage in a more restrictive environment, suggesting the need for synchronization of production environment and germ plasm resources. Some of the sources of variation in maintenance requirements have been discussed. Data are cited that suggest little of the variation in maintenance energy expenditures is attributable to variation in total body composition per se. However, considerable evidence has accumulated to show that a relatively large proportion of maintenance energy expenditures can be attributed to energy expenditures of visceral organs, especially the liver and gastrointestinal tract. High rates of energy expenditures of these tissues appear to be directly or indirectly associated with the high rates of protein synthesis in these tissues. Greater use of differing research approaches and assimilation of the results are needed to develop an understanding of the reasons for variation among animals in maintenance energy expenditures or energetic efficiency.

BackgroundIn a previously reported genome-wide association study based on a high-density bovine SNP genotyping array, 8 SNP were nominally associated (P ≤ 0.003) with average daily gain (ADG) and 3 of these were also associated (P ≤ 0.002) with average daily feed intake (ADFI) in a population of crossbred beef cattle. The SNP were clustered in a 570 kb region around 38 Mb on the draft sequence of bovine chromosome 6 (BTA6), an interval containing several positional and functional candidate genes including the bovine LAP3, NCAPG, and LCORL genes. The goal of the present study was to develop and examine additional markers in this region to optimize the ability to distinguish favorable alleles, with potential to identify functional variation.ResultsAnimals from the original study were genotyped for 47 SNP within or near the gene boundaries of the three candidate genes. Sixteen markers in the NCAPG-LCORL locus displayed significant association with both ADFI and ADG even after stringent correction for multiple testing (P ≤ 005). These markers were evaluated for their effects on meat and carcass traits. The alleles associated with higher ADFI and ADG were also associated with higher hot carcass weight (HCW) and ribeye area (REA), and lower adjusted fat thickness (AFT). A reduced set of markers was genotyped on a separate, crossbred population including genetic contributions from 14 beef cattle breeds. Two of the markers located within the LCORL gene locus remained significant for ADG (P ≤ 0.04).ConclusionsSeveral markers within the NCAPG-LCORL locus were significantly associated with feed intake and body weight gain phenotypes. These markers were also associated with HCW, REA and AFT suggesting that they are involved with lean growth and reduced fat deposition. Additionally, the two markers significant for ADG in the validation population of animals may be more robust for the prediction of ADG and possibly the correlated trait ADFI, across multiple breeds and populations of cattle.

Thirty-two crossbred wether lambs (initial live-weight 31 kg) were fed on a diet (metabolizable energy (ME) 12.8 MJ/kg) ad lib. (ADLIB) or restricted to maintain body-weight (MAINT) for a 21 d period.On days 0,7,14 and 21, four lambs per treatment were slaughtered, visceral organs weighed and tissues sampled. During the 21 d period, M E intake in ADLIB lambs increased quadratically with an average rate of live-weight gain of 425 g/d. In MAINT lambs, live weight (30 kg) was maintained, and daily M E intake (kJ/kg empty body-weight (EBW)"') declined (P < 0.01) quadratically with time. Weights of liver, stomach and small intestines as a percentage of EBW were increased in ADLIB lambs and decreased by 10-33% in MAINT lambs (treatment x day, P < 0.01). In vitro liver oxygen consumption was not affected by level of feed intake. Estimates of whole-liver 0, consumption (mmol O,/d per kg EBW) increased in ADLIB lambs and were relatively constant in MAINT lambs. These findings suggest that level of feed intake changes the relative proportion of visceral organs to body mass. In addition, the effect of level of feed intake on changes in the relative contribution of visceral organs to whole-body metabolic rate appears to be primarily a result of differences in organ size rather than tissue-specific metabolic activity.Nutrient restriction: Organ size and metabolism : Sheep Several studies have indicated that a decreased plane of nutrition results in a decrease in metabolic rate