We model the formation of lunar complex craters and investigate the effect of preimpact porosity on their gravity signatures. We find that while preimpact target porosities less than ~7% produce negative residual Bouguer anomalies (BAs), porosities greater than ~7% produce positive anomalies whose magnitude is greater for impacted surfaces with higher initial porosity. Negative anomalies result from pore space creation due to fracturing and dilatant bulking, and positive anomalies result from destruction of pore space due to shock wave compression. The central BA of craters larger than ~215 km in diameter, however, are invariably positive because of an underlying central mantle uplift. We conclude that the striking differences between the gravity signatures of craters on the Earth and Moon are the result of the higher average porosity and variable porosity of the lunar crust.

We have analyzed the Bouguer anomaly (BA) of ~1200 complex craters in the lunar highlands from Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory observations. The BA of these craters is generally negative, though positive BA values are observed, particularly for smaller craters. Crater BA values scale inversely with crater diameter, quantifying how larger impacts produce more extensive fracturing and dilatant bulking. The Bouguer anomaly of craters larger than 93prefix−19prefix+47 km in diameter is independent of crater size, indicating that there is a limiting depth to impact‐generated porosity, presumably from pore collapse associated with either overburden pressure or viscous flow. Impact‐generated porosity of the bulk lunar crust is likely in a state of equilibrium for craters smaller than ~30 km in diameter, consistent with an ~8 km thick lunar megaregolith, whereas the gravity signature of larger craters is still preserved and provides new insight into the cratering record of even the oldest lunar surfaces.

The lack of magnetic anomalies within the major impact basins (Hellas, Argyre, and Isidis) has led many investigators to the conclusion that Mars' dynamo shut down prior to the time when these basins formed (∼4.0 Ga). We test this hypothesis by analyzing gravity and magnetic anomalies in the regions surrounding Tyrrhenus Mons and Syrtis Major, two volcanoes that were active during the late Noachian and Hesperian. We model magnetic anomalies that are associated with gravity anomalies and generally find that sources located below Noachian surface units tend to favor paleopoles near the equator and sources located below Hesperian surface features favor paleopoles near the geographical poles, suggesting polar wander during the Noachian‐Hesperian. Both paleopole clusters have positive and negative polarities, indicating reversals of the field during the Noachian and Hesperian. Magnetization of sources below Hesperian surfaces is evidence that the dynamo persisted beyond the formation of the major impact basins. The demagnetization associated with the volcanic construct of Syrtis Major implies dynamo cessation occurred while it was geologically active approximately 3.6 billion years ago. Timing of dynamo activity is fundamentally linked to Mars' climate via the stability of its atmosphere, and is coupled to the extent and duration of surface geologic activity. Thus, the dynamo history is key for understanding both when Mars was most geologically active and when it may have been most hospitable to life.