OBJECTIVES To evaluate the potential of 11C‐choline‐positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for planning surgery in patients with prostate cancer and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) relapse after treatment with curative intent. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 10 patients with PSA recurrence after either external beam radiation (two) or radical retropubic prostatectomy (eight) for prostate cancer, and who had a laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for suspicious lymph nodes detected on 11C‐choline‐PET/CT. The histological results and PET/CT findings were compared. RESULTS In all, 22 suspicious lymph nodes were found on PET/CT, and 14 on conventional CT or magnetic resonance imaging. Comparing the conventional imaging showed concordance in 13 lymph nodes. Three of the 10 patients had no metastatic lymph node disease on definitive histology. The mean (sd) PSA level for these patients was 1.0 (0.4) ng/mL, whereas that in patients with lymph node metastases was 15.1 (9.2) ng/mL (statistically significant difference, P < 0.05). The positive predictive value was seven of 10. All of the patients initially regressed, with PSA increases after lymphadenectomy. Two of the patients are being managed by watchful waiting, two had radiotherapy of the prostate fossa and two had chemotherapy with docetaxel. Four patients were treated by hormone‐deprivation therapy. After a mean (sd) follow up of 11 (7) months, one patient died, one has PSA progression, but none of those with negative histology has clinical signs of local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS 11C‐choline‐PET is a valuable tool for detecting recurrent prostate cancer, but the limited positive predictive value should lead to a critical interpretation of the results.

Pre-therapeutic (68)Ga-DOTATOC tumor uptake as well as assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC are strongly associated with the results of subsequent PRRT. The defined cut-off values should be confirmed by prospective studies and may then provide the rationale for individual dosing and selecting patients with high likelihood of favorable treatment outcome.

Viable GS are FDG-avid. Using this metabolic information and morphologic CT criteria, combined FDG-PET/CT was more accurate in lesion detection than FDG-PET or CT alone. Changes in FDG uptake after therapy might be a useful additional parameter for therapy monitoring. Therefore, FDG-PET/CT appears to be a promising diagnostic and monitoring tool in the management of patients with GS.

In the absence of preoperative somatostatin receptor ( SST) scans, knowledge of immunohistochemical SST2 tumor expression may help predicting the success of somatostatin analogue-based follow-up studies and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NET). We studied the association between SST immunostaining and tracer uptake in [(111)In]-DTPA octreotide (DTPAOC) scintigraphy and [(68)Ga]-DOTA-D-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide (DOTATOC) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Retrospective analy-sis of 36 NET patients was carried out. In 40 tumors, immunohistochemical SST2, SST3, and SST5 expressions were analyzed using a pathological scoring, applying monoclonal ( SST2) or polyclonal antibodies (SST3, SST5). In 14 lesions, [(111)In]-DTPAOC uptake was assessed by a semiquantitative score. In 26 tumors, [(68)Ga]-DOTATOC PET/CT was quantified using an uptake score and maximal standard uptake value (SUV(max)). Combined and separate qualitative analysis of SST scans revealed significant associations between increased tracer uptake and immunohistochemical SST2 detection (combined: rho=0.56, p=0.0002, [(111)In]-DTPAOC: rho=0.63, p=0.0152, and [(68)Ga]-DOTATOC: rho=0.52, p=0.0065, respectively). In contrast, SST3 and SST5 immunostaining was not associated with tracer uptake (all p>0.14). The semiquantitative immunohistochemical score for SST2 was associated with the [(68)Ga]-DOTATOC uptake score and SUV (max) values (rho=0.67, p=0.0002 and rho=0.63, p=0.0010, respectively), but not with the [(111)In]-DTPAOC uptake score (rho=0.24, p=0.4). In patients without preoperative SST scans, knowledge of immunohistochemical SST2 expression may help estimating the value of SST imaging in the clinical follow-up, in particular in those lesions with positive SST2 immunostaining. Negativity for SST2, however, does not rule out tracer uptake in some patients, with heterogeneous SST2 expression within the tumor as a potential explanation.

No abstract