BACKGROUND Because of its alpha and beta agonist properties, norepinephrine infusion is currently being studied for the prevention of spinal hypotension during caesarean delivery. Vasopressor infusions are not always possible if there is an unavailability of infusion pumps. Leg wrapping with crepe bandage is an effective technique for prevention of postspinal hypotension and could be useful in resource-poor settings. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of hypotension with norepinephrine infusion or leg wrapping with a control group in women undergoing caesarean delivery with spinal anaesthesia. DESIGN Randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. SETTING Single centre, tertiary level institute, India. Study period 3 April 2018 to 31 March 2019. PATIENTS One hundred and forty-four women aged 19 to 40 years with a singleton pregnancy. INTERVENTION In group Leg Wrapping, crepe bandage was applied tightly from metatarsus to groin. Group Norepinephrine and the control group received sham leg wrapping. In group Norepinephrine, the women received a norepinephrine infusion according to their body weight, while group Leg Wrapping and the control group received a 0.9% normal saline infusion at a similar rate. All three groups received a 500 ml co-load of Ringer's solution over 15 min. Noninvasive SBP was monitored every 2 min until delivery, and every 5 min thereafter. Any hypotensive event (SBP < 20% of baseline) was treated with an intravenous bolus of norepinephrine (7.5 μg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension. The secondary outcomes were performance error measurements, and the incidences of hypertension, bradycardia, norepinephrine rescue bolus and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS The incidences of hypotension were significantly lower in the norepinephrine infusion group and the leg wrapping groups than the control group (P values 0.021 for both). Performance error calculations showed that SBP was maintained closer to baseline with the norepinephrine infusion. CONCLUSION Norepinephrine infusion and leg wrapping can both reduce the incidence of postspinal hypotension during elective caesarean delivery compared with saline infusion alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trial number and registry URL: CTRI/2018/04/012917 registered at Clinical Trial Registry of India http://www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php.
Background: Arm abduction influences cross-sectional area of the infraclavicular axillary vein, yet the effect of arm abduction on collapsibility of the vein has not been quantified. Decrease in collapsibility of the axillary vein can enable successful cannulation and can decrease injury to underlying vital structures. Methods: The infraclavicular axillary vein was scanned in 70 patients close to the clavicle with a high-frequency linear transducer in arm adducted position (Point A), after arm abduction at the initial probe position (Point A′) and after tracing the vein medially close to clavicle (Point B). Maximum and minimum cross-sectional area and circumference during tidal breathing and collapsibility indices during tidal and deep breathing were measured at three probe positions. Results: The percentage change with respiration in cross-sectional area, circumference and the collapsibility indices computed from the above measurements were lesser in arm abducted position (p < 0.001). There was decrease in collapsibility index during tidal breathing from 25 at Point A to 7 at Point A′ and 3 at Point B. Collapsibility index reduced from 91 at Point A to 30 at Point A′ and 35 at Point B during deep breathing. Conclusion: We conclude that the collapsibility of the infraclavicular axillary vein could be reduced by arm abduction, and hence, abduction could be proposed as the ideal arm position for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary vein cannulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.