No abstract

Plasma exchange and administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IgG) are established treatments for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Elimination of postulated pathogenetic factors by plasma exchange or selective adsorption treatment using affinity-type adsorption columns and subsequent immunomodulation by intravenous IgG may provide a more effective treatment. Forty-five patients with acute GBS were prospectively examined using a clinical score. We treated 11 patients by plasma exchange, 13 patients by selective adsorption using a tryptophan-linked polyvinyl alcohol gel adsorbent, and 21 patients by selective adsorption followed by intravenous IgG. The patients treated sequentially by selective adsorption and intravenous IgG improved significantly better than the patients who received plasma treatment only. The results suggest that sequential treatment of GBS may be superior to plasma treatment alone. The higher cost of combined treatment may be offset by lower overall expenditure.

No abstract

Elimination of circulating antibodies by hemapheresis is an empirical treatment concept in various neuroimmunological diseases. Plasma exchange (PE) has been shown to be superior to symptomatic treatment in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in two large multicenter studies. It is also effective in myasthenia gravis (MG), although no comparative studies have been performed. Immunoadsorption (IA) using polyvinyl alcohol gel columns to which phenylalanin (IM-PH) or tryptophan (IM-TR) are covalently bound is an alternative to PE, and seems to have equal efficacy and comparable side effects. This method also obviates the need for replacement of plasma with human albumin or plasma. We compared the treatment results of 11 patients with GBS treated by PE to those of 13 patients treated by IA using an IM-TR column. Here, we found no statistically significant differences with regard to efficacy and clinical or procedural complications. From these data we conclude that immunoadsorption can be used as an equal alternative to PE. A large multicenter study comparing PE, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), and the combination of both in the treatment of GBS revealed no significant difference between the 3 treatment groups. In MG, only 2 small studies have been performed using IA, and no studies comparing PE or other treatments to IA have been conducted. Both investigations of IA therapy demonstrated a marked reduction in the acetylcholine receptor (AchR) antibodies and a sustained improvement of the clinical signs. These results therefore show that IA is an effective treatment for myasthenia gravis.

This study aimed at providing real-life baseline, injection and outcome data for the treatment of various forms of spasticity with onabotulinumtoxin A in Germany. Prospective data were collected in an open multicenter patient registry from 2005 until 2010, encompassing the experience of ten specialized German centers in the treatment of spasticity using onabotulinumtoxin A in 508 patients with a total of 2005 treatment sessions. Disease entities comprised spasticity following stroke (both ischemic and hemorrhagic), traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, and anoxia. Sustained improvement was observed in a variety of outcome parameters including goal attainment and motor performance scores for up to five repeated injection sessions. No significant differences between disease entities or between upper and lower limb treatment were observed with regard to efficacy and safety following onabotulinumtoxin A treatment. Minor to moderate side effects were reported in <1 % of the study population. We conclude that repetitive treatment of focal and multifocal spasticity with onabotulinumtoxin A provides a safe and efficacious therapeutic strategy for patients with different disease entities of the central nervous system.