In a retrospective, single-center cohort study, outcomes of infants and toddlers undergoing lung transplant at St. Louis Children's Hospital between 1990 and 2004 were compared to older children. Patients with cystic fibrosis (exclusively older children) and those who underwent heart-lung, liver-lung, single lung or a second transplantation were excluded from comparisons. One hundred nine lung transplants were compared. Thirty-six were in infants <1 year old, 26 in toddlers 1-3 years old and 47 in children >3 years old. Graft survival was similar for infants and toddlers (p = 0.35 and p = 0.3, respectively) compared to children over 3 years old at 1 and 3 years after transplant. Significantly more infants (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.003) and toddlers (p = 0.002 and p = 0.03) were free from acute rejection and bronchiolitis obliterans compared to older patients. While most infants and toddlers had only minimal lung function impairment, and achieved normal to mildly delayed developmental scores, somatic growth remained depressed 5 years after transplant. Lung transplantation in infants and young children carries similar survival rates to older children and adults. Further insights into the unique immunologic aspects of this group of patients may elucidate strategies to prevent acute and chronic rejection in all age groups.
Forty-one residents enrolled and 32 (78%) completed a post-programme survey. Of those, 21 (66%) preferred a Q&A format with an immediate text response versus information-only texts. The percentage change in ITE scores between 2013 and 2014 was significant. Comparing subgroups, there was no significant difference between the percentage change in ITE scores. Neither group performed significantly better on either the adolescent or developmental sections of the ITE. Text messaging… remains an underused educational tool CONCLUSIONS: Overall, participants improved their ITE scores, but no improvement was seen in the targeted subgroups on the exam. Although Q&A texts are preferred by residents, further assessment is required to assess the effect on educational outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.