Background:
While both full and subthreshold posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may be linked to physical conditions, contemporary population-based data on these associations in military veterans are scarce. Further, little is known about how component aspects of PTSD, which is a heterogeneous disorder, may relate to physical conditions in this population.
Methods:
Data were analyzed from a population-based sample of 3157 U.S. military veterans who participated in the 2011 National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study. Multiple logistic regression analyses evaluated associations between full and subthreshold PTSD, and physical conditions.
Results:
A total 6.1% of the sample met screening criteria for full PTSD and 9.0% for subthreshold PTSD. Both full and subthreshold PTSD were associated with increased odds of sleep disorder (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.52 and 2.10, respectively) and respiratory conditions (AOR = 2.60 and 1.87, respectively). Full PTSD was additionally associated with increased odds of osteoporosis or osteopenia (AOR = 2.72) and migraine (AOR = 1.91), while subthreshold PTSD only was associated with increased odds of diabetes (AOR = 1.42). Analyses of PTSD symptom clusters revealed that all of these associations were primarily driven by dysphoric arousal symptoms, which are characterized by sleep difficulties, anger/irritability, and concentration problems.
Limitations:
The study used self-report measures for health conditions and DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for PTSD.
Conclusion:
Results of this study provide a characterization of physical conditions associated with full and subthreshold PTSD in U.S. military veterans. They highlight the potential importance of PTSD dysphoric arousal in risk models of certain physical conditions in this population.
Introduction: Risk assessment for post-operative delirium (POD) is poorly developed. Improved metrics could greatly facilitate peri-operative care as costs associated with POD are staggering. In this preliminary study, we develop a novel stress-diathesis model based on comprehensive pre-operative psychiatric and neuropsychological testing, a blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) carbon dioxide (CO2) stress test, and high fidelity measures of intra-operative parameters that may interact facilitating POD.Methods: The study was approved by the ethics board at the University of Manitoba and registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02126215. Twelve patients were studied. Pre-operative psychiatric symptom measures and neuropsychological testing preceded MRI featuring a BOLD MRI CO2 stress test whereby BOLD scans were conducted while exposing participants to a rigorously controlled CO2 stimulus. During surgery the patient had hemodynamics and end-tidal gases downloaded at 0.5 hz. Post-operatively, the presence of POD and POD severity was comprehensively assessed using the Confusion Assessment Measure –Severity (CAM-S) scoring instrument on days 0 (surgery) through post-operative day 5, and patients were followed up at least 1 month post-operatively.Results: Six of 12 patients had no evidence of POD (non-POD). Three patients had POD and 3 had clinically significant confusional states (referred as subthreshold POD; ST-POD) (score ≥ 5/19 on the CAM-S). Average severity for delirium was 1.3 in the non-POD group, 3.2 in ST-POD, and 6.1 in POD (F-statistic = 15.4, p < 0.001). Depressive symptoms, and cognitive measures of semantic fluency and executive functioning/processing speed were significantly associated with POD. Second level analysis revealed an increased inverse BOLD responsiveness to CO2 pre-operatively in ST-POD and marked increase in the POD groups when compared to the non-POD group. An association was also noted for the patient population to manifest leucoaraiosis as assessed with advanced neuroimaging techniques. Results provide preliminary support for the interacting of diatheses (vulnerabilities) and intra-operative stressors on the POD phenotype.Conclusions: The stress-diathesis model has the potential to aid in risk assessment for POD. Based on these initial findings, we make some recommendations for intra-operative management for patients at risk of POD.
Dissociative symptoms and suicidality are transdiagnostic features of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD). The primary objective of this study was to examine associations between dissociation (i.e., depersonalization and derealization) and suicidality (i.e., self‐harm and suicide attempts) among individuals with PTSD and BPD. We analyzed data from the 2012–2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC‐III; N = 36,309). The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule for DSM‐5 was used to assess lifetime PTSD and BPD. Estimated rates of self‐harm among individuals who endorsed dissociation were 15.5%–26.2% for those with PTSD and 13.7%–23.5% for those with BPD, and estimates of suicide attempts among individuals who endorsed dissociation were 34.5%–38.1% for those with PTSD and 28.3%–33.1% for those with BPD. Multiple logistic regressions were conducted to examine the associations between dissociation (derealization, depersonalization, and both) and both self‐harm and suicide attempts among respondents with PTSD and BPD. The results indicated that dissociation was associated with self‐harm and suicide attempts, especially among individuals with BPD, aORs = 1.39–2.66; however, this association may be driven in part by a third variable, such as other symptoms of PTSD or BPD (e.g., mood disturbance, PTSD or BPD symptom severity). These results may inform risk assessments and targeted interventions for vulnerable individuals with PTSD, BPD, or both aimed at mitigating the risk of self‐harm and suicide.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.