No abstract

Background: Coronary function testing in patients with ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) commonly includes assessment of adenosine-mediated vasodilation and acetylcholine spasm provocation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of additional endothelial function testing for the diagnosis of vasomotor dysfunction in patients with INOCA. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with INOCA who underwent clinically indicated comprehensive coronary function testing. Endothelial dysfunction was defined as a <50% increase in coronary blood flow, determined by Doppler flow, and/or epicardial vasoconstriction compared to baseline, in response to low-dose acetylcholine. Coronary artery spasm (CAS) was defined as vasospastic angina or microvascular angina in response to coronary high-dose acetylcholine. An impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation was defined as a coronary flow reserve <2.5 and/or hyperemic microvascular resistance ≥2.5. Results: Among all 110 patients, 79% had endothelial dysfunction, 62% had CAS, and 29% had an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. Endothelial dysfunction was present in 80% of patients who tested positively for CAS and/or an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. Endothelial function testing increases the diagnostic yield of coronary function testing that only incorporates adenosine testing and spasm provocation by 17% to 92%. Of patients with normal adenosine-mediated vasodilation and no inducible CAS, 68% had endothelial dysfunction. Conclusions: Concomitant endothelial dysfunction was prevalent in the vast majority of patients with INOCA with inducible CAS and/or an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. In patients with INOCA without inducible CAS and normal adenosine-mediated vasodilation, two-thirds had endothelial dysfunction. These results indicate the relevance to perform endothelial function testing in patients with INOCA in view of its therapeutic implication.

BackgroundCoronary artery spasm (CAS), encompassing epicardial and microvascular spasm, is increasingly recognized as cause of angina in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). However, various spasm provocation testing protocols and diagnostic criteria are used, making diagnosis and characterization of these patients difficult and interpretation of study results cumbersome. This review provides a structured overview of the prevalence, characterization and prognosis of CAS worldwide in men and women.MethodsA systematic review identifying studies describing ANOCA patients with CAS was performed. Multiple outcomes (prevalence, clinical features, and prognosis) were assessed. Data, except for prognosis were pooled and analysed using random effects meta-analysis models.ResultsTwenty-five publications (N = 14.554) were included (58.2 years; 44.2% women). Percentages of epicardial constriction to define epicardial spasm ranged from &gt;50% to &gt;90%. Epicardial spasm was prevalent in 43% (range 16–73%), with a higher prevalence in Asian vs. Western World population (52% vs. 33%, p = 0.014). Microvascular spasm was prevalent in 25% (range 7–39%). Men were more likely to have epicardial spasm (61%), women were more likely to have microvascular spasm (64%). Recurrent angina is frequently reported during follow-up ranging from 10 to 53%.ConclusionCAS is highly prevalent in ANOCA patients, where men more often have epicardial spasm, women more often have microvascular spasm. A higher prevalence of epicardial spasm is demonstrated in the Asian population compared to the Western World. The prevalence of CAS is high, emphasizing the use of unambiguous study protocols and diagnostic criteria and highlights the importance of routine evaluation of CAS in men and women with ANOCA.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=272100.

Background: In patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), QRS duration (QRSd) depends on left ventricular (LV) dimension. Previously, we demonstrated that normalizing QRSd to LV dimension, to adjust for variations in LV size, improved prediction of hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In addition, sex-specific differences in CRT outcome have been attributed to normalized QRSd. The present study evaluates the effect of normalization of QRSd to LV dimension on prediction of survival after CRT implantation. Methods: In this 2-center study, we studied 250 heart failure patients with LV ejection fraction ≤35% and QRSd ≥120 ms who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before CRT implantation. LV end-diastolic volumes were used for QRSd normalization (ie, QRSd/LV end-diastolic volumes). The primary end point was a combined end point of death, LV assist device, or heart transplantation. Results: During a median follow-up of 3.9 years, 79 (32%) patients reached the primary end point. Using univariable Cox regression, unadjusted QRSd was unrelated to CRT outcome ( P =0.116). In contrast, normalized QRSd was a strong predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 0.81 per 0.1 ms/mL; P =0.008). Women demonstrated higher normalized QRSd than men (0.62±0.17 versus 0.55±0.17 ms/mL; P =0.003) and showed better survival after CRT (hazard ratio, 0.52; P =0.018). A multivariable prognostic model included normalized QRSd together with age, atrial fibrillation, renal function, and heart failure cause, whereas sex, diabetes mellitus, strict left bundle branch block morphology, and LV end-diastolic volumes were expelled from the model. Conclusions: Normalization of QRSd to LV dimension improves prediction of survival after CRT implantation. In addition, sex-specific differences in CRT outcome might be attributed to the higher QRSd/LV end-diastolic volumes ratio that was found in selected women, indicating more conduction delay.