The overall survival of CRC patients has improved between 1996 and 2006. LNR is a powerful factor for estimating the survival of stage III CRC patients.

No abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the standard first line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitive EGFR mutations. Among NSCLC, giant cell carcinoma of the lung (GCCL) is a rare pathological subtype with poor prognosis, with no confirmed evidence about its epidemiological features or therapeutic efficiency of EGFR-TKIs. We present two advanced GCCLs with sensitive EGFR mutations, also collected the cases of GCCL from our hospital and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to perform the survival analyses. Both two cases of advanced GCCL with sensitive EGFR mutations benefited from EGFR-TKIs. Twelve GCCLs were recorded in our hospital from May 2006 to July 2015. GCCL is associated with males (83.3%) and smoking status (63.6%). The EGFR mutation rate was 40.0%. In SEER database, the total number of GCCLs was 184, 0.11% for all NSCLCs. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 5-year overall survival of GCCL patients was significantly lower than that of non-GCC NSCLC (16% and 19%; P<0.001), and it was confirmed in multivariate analysis. Further survival analyses indicated that male were more susceptible to GCCL and GCCL was prone to metastasize. Only age and M stage were independent prognostic factors for GCCL in the multivariate analysis. In conclusion, GCCL was an unfavorable prognostic factor and associated with males and metastasis. GCCL patients with sensitive EGFR mutations may also benefit from EGFR-TKI, we therefore recommend the evaluation of EGFR in the treatment of advanced GCCL.

No abstract

BackgroundThe role of surgical therapy in gastric cancer patients with distant metastases remains controversial. This retrospective analysis was performed to identify whether gastric cancer patients with distant metastases might benefit from surgery.Patients and methodsA total of 5185 patients from the SEER database who were initially diagnosed with histologically confirmed gastric cancer with distant metastases from 2004 to 2009 were included. Patients were divided into the following three groups: patients who underwent resection of both the primary tumor and distant metastatic tumors (‘PMTR’ group), patients who only underwent resection of the primary tumor (‘PTR’ group) and patients who did not undergo any surgery (‘No surgery’ group). We employed the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate the survival time of the different groups.ResultsA total of 5185 patients had a median survival time (MST) of 9.0 months. The improvement in survival of the ‘PMTR’ and ‘PTR’ groups was significantly different compared with that of the ‘No surgery’ group (MST, 12.0 vs 12.0 vs 9.0 months, respectively, P<0.001; 1-year survival rate, 49.6% vs 49.1% vs 30.1%, respectively, P<0.001; 3-year survival rate, 12.5% vs 15.1% vs 5.8%, respectively, P<0.001), whereas no significant difference was found between the ‘PMTR’ group and ‘PTR’ group (P=0.642). Multivariate Cox proportional analysis showed that surgery was an independent prognostic factor (‘PMTR’, hazard ratio (HR) =0.648, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.574-0.733, P<0.001; ‘PTR’, HR=0.631, 95% CI 0.583-0.684, P<0.001).ConclusionsThis retrospective analysis demonstrated that combined PTR and metastasectomy or PTR alone were independent prognostic factors for survival improvement in gastric cancer patients with distant metastases. Because no statistically significant difference in survival was observed between the ‘PMTR’ group and ‘PTR’ group, PTR, which is a more minor surgery, might be more appropriate than PMTR in clinical practice for gastric cancer patients with distant metastases.