A European Federation of Cytology Societies (EFCS) working party of 28 members from 14 European countries met at the European Congress of Cytology in Lisbon in September 2009, with two observers from the USA, to discuss the need for standardising thyroid FNA nomenclature in the light of the National Institute of Cancer (NCI) recommendations resulting from the State of the Science conference in Bethesda in 2007. The data were obtained through two questionnaires sent by email and a transcript of the live discussion at the congress, which is presented in full. The surveys and discussion showed that there were currently no national terminologies for reporting thyroid FNA in the different European countries except in Italy and the UK. Personal, 'local', surgical pathology and descriptive terminologies were in use. All but one of the working party members agreed that thyroid FNA reporting should be standardised. Whilst almost a third would adopt the NCI Bethesda terminology, which offers the advantages of a 'risk of cancer' correlation and is linked to clinical recommendations, more than half favoured a translation of local terminology as the first step towards a unified nomenclature, as has been done recently in the UK. There was some disagreement about the use of: a) the six-tiered as opposed to four or five-tiered systems, b) the use of an indeterminate category and c) the 'follicular neoplasm' category, which was felt by some participants not to be different from the 'suspicious of malignancy' category. The conclusions will be passed to the different national societies of cytology for discussion, who will be asked to map their local terminologies to the Bethesda classification, observe its acceptance by clinicians and audit its correlation with outcome.

To evaluate the histologic alterations due to the fine‐needle aspiration (FNA), a comparative study between 20 aspirated and 20 nonaspirated thyroidectomy specimens was performed. The most common findings in the aspirated group were hemorrhage (80%) and vascular proliferation and/or vascular thrombosis (45%). In one of the aspirated cases with the cytologic diagnosis of follicular neoplasm, histologic sections revealed prominent vascular and endothelial proliferation. Fibrosis, cystic degeneration, and infarction were other histologic findings in the aspirated group. Hemorrhage was seen in 45% and cystic degeneration in 25% of the nonaspirated cases. Fifty percent of the nonaspirated cases did not have any additional findings. In conclusion, knowledge of previous FNA application and awareness of possible histologic alterations due to the needling is necessary while evaluating the histologic sections of the thyroidectomy specimens. Diagn. Cytopathol. 16:230–232, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of testicular fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with open biopsy in infertile males with azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia and to evaluate the reliability of testicular sperm extraction by FNA. A total of 76 testes of 40 patients, 34 with azoospermia, four oligozoospermia and two patients who underwent orchidectomy as a result of cancer of prostate were included. Detailed clinical and laboratory examinations were performed and two semen analyses were obtained from each patient. A 20-ml 26 gauge 13-mm needle was used for FNA and smears were stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa and Papanicolaou stain. An open biopsy was performed in each patient after FNA and the samples were stained with haematoxylen-eosin. Smears and histological stains were examined and compared under light microscopy by the same pathologist. In 69 of the 76 testes (90%) FNA cytology results agreed with the histology. In four testes, the aspirate was unsatisfactory and in three testes, spermatocytic arrest was found cytologically while subsequent biopsies revealed diffuse fibrosis. In 15 of 16 patients (93.7%) with normal and hypospermatogenesis, spermatozoa had been extracted by FNA. Spermatozoa could not be obtained after neither FNA nor open biopsy in the remaining 24 patients. Testicular FNA in infertile males is a simple, reliable and minimally invasive diagnostic tool. It is as effective as open biopsy for testicular sperm extraction and good results can be achieved in experienced hands.

Disparate entities may present with similar cytological findings in the H&N region. A detailed description of differential diagnosis should be given in the cytology report in suspicious cases. Repeated aspirations from different sites of the lesion may reduce the false-negative rate.

No abstract