The 17-year-old male patient presented with fever, weakness, dyspnea and weight loss. His chest radiography demonstrated diffuse reticulonodular density, and high-resolution lung tomography indicated diffuse micronodules and prevalent ground-glass pattern. The findings were consistent with miliary involvement. The patient underwent examinations for rheumatology, immunology, cytology and infectious conditions. His immune system was normal and had no comorbidities or any history of immunosuppressive treatment. Strongyloides stercoralis larvae were noted upon direct inspection of the feces. Clinical and radiological improvement was achieved with albendazole 400 mg/day. This case is being presented since miliary involvement in the lungs caused by S. stercoralis infection in an individual with intact immune system is rare and difficult to diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE:Physicians do not adequately use their unique professional privilege to prevent patients from smoking. The aim of this study was to investigate the type and extent of advice given to patients by physicians of different medical specialties regarding smoking cessation.METHODS:In total, 317 volunteer physicians were included in this study. The participants rated their attitudes toward the smoking habits of their patients by completing a questionnaire. The approaches used to address the smoking habits of patients significantly differed among physicians working at polyclinics, clinics and emergency service departments (p<0.001). Physicians working at clinics exhibited the highest frequency of inquiring about the smoking habits of their patients, while physicians working at emergency service departments exhibited the lowest frequency.RESULTS:Physicians from different medical specialties significantly differed in their responses. Physicians specializing in lung diseases, thoracic surgery, and cardiology were more committed to preventing their patients from cigarette smoking.CONCLUSIONS:The role of physicians, particularly pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons, is critical in the fight against cigarette smoking. Promoting physician awareness of this subject is highly important in all other branches of medicine.
Our results support the hypothesis that an imbalance between factors promoting angiogenesis, such as PLGF, and factors antagonizing angiogenesis, such as sFLT-1, has a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. The new established ELISA test can be considered reliable and it offers many advantages. As it is authorized for routine diagnostic testing, it may offer new possibilities in the prediction of preeclampsia in clinical routine.
Background: An imbalance between angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors plays a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Serum levels of placental growth factor (PLGF), a factor promoting angiogenesis, in patients with preeclampsia are significantly lower than in nonpreeclamptic pregnancies. This study was designed to answer the question whether the measurement of PLGF at the beginning of the second trimester might be a predictive factor for the appearance of preeclampsia. Methods: Serum samples of 61 women were collected between 15 and 18 weeks of pregnancy. PLGF levels were measured using a human PLGF ELISA and correlated with the outcomes of pregnancy. Results: 7 women (11.47%) developed preeclampsia during pregnancy. Their PLGF levels between 15 and 18 weeks of pregnancy were significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared to the nonpreeclamptic pregnancies. Using a PLGF level of 41.84 pg/ml as a cutoff, this test has a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.83. Conclusion: Women who will develop preeclampsia in the course of pregnancy already have a significantly lower expression of PLGF between 15 and 18 weeks of pregnancy compared to those who will not. This test offers new possibilities in the prediction of preeclampsia.
PS/S-PCT levels were found to be highly efficient in excluding PPPE but not sufficiently reliable in the diagnosis of it. However, these findings should be reassessed in a larger group of cases that have not been given any antibiotic/anti-inflammatory treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.