Objective: This retrospective clinical study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical success of dental implants restored with splinted or non-splinted posterior prostheses with different retention systems. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients who had undergone dental implant surgery and prosthesis treatment and had a follow-up period of at least 2 years were included in this study. Marginal bone loss was measured from the surrounding bone levels on the mesial and distal surfaces of the implants using a millimetre ruler on panoramic radiographs. The plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were also measured. The Mann-Whitney U test and ANOVA test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean values of mesial and distal bone loss were 0.72±0.81 and 0.62±0.58, respectively. The correlation coefficient between mesial and distal bone loss was 0.431; thus, a significant difference was found (p<0.05). A significant relationship was found between the GI (p=0.004) and PI (p=0.000) of dental implants with different retention types. No significant relationship was observed between BOP and retention type (p>0.05).
Conclusion:Clinically, given the long-term maintenance of soft and hard tissue health, successful results can be achieved with a two-member fixed prosthetic rehabilitation plan on two implants. Amaç: Bu retrospektif klinik çalışma, posterior bölgedeki farklı retansiyon sistemlerine sahip splintli veya tek başına planlanan protetik tedavinin dental implantların uzun vadeli klinik başarısına etkisini değerlendirmektedir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya, dental implant cerrahisi ve sonrasında protetik tedavi uygulanan ve en az iki yıllık takip süresi olan 50 hasta dahil edildi. Marjinal kemik kaybı, panoramik radyografiler üzerinde milimetrik bir cetvel kullanılarak implantların mezial ve distal yüzeylerini çevreleyen kemik seviyeleri göz önüne
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.