During development, the brain goes through fundamental processes, including organization of neural networks and plasticity. Environmental interventions may change initial brain programming, leading to long-lasting effects and altering the susceptibility to psychopathologies, including depression disorder. It is known that depression is a psychiatric disorder with a high prevalence worldwide, including high rates among adolescents. In this study, we evaluated whether social isolation in the prepubertal period and chronic use of high-fat diet (HFD) may induce depressive-like behavior in male adult rats. We also investigated hippocampal plasticity markers and neurotransmitter systems. We found both social isolation and HFD induced a depressive-like behavior in the forced swimming task. Moreover, chronic HFD reduced synaptic markers in hippocampus, demonstrated by reductions in βIII-tubulin (neuronal marker), PSD-95, SNAP-25, and neurotrophin-3. The HFD group also presented decreased glutamatergic and GABAergic receptors subunits. On the other hand, stress affected hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling pathways, and increased expression of subunit of the NMDA receptor (NR2A). Both factors (stress and diet) decreased GR in the hippocampus without affecting plasma corticosterone at basal levels. Interactions between early stress and HFD access were observed only in the BNDF receptor (tropomyosin receptor kinase B; TrkB) and synaptophysin. In summary, these findings showed that a brief social isolation and chronic HFD, during a sensitive developmental period, cause depressive-like behavior in adulthood. The mechanisms underlying these behavioral effects may involve changes in the levels of synaptic proteins in hippocampus: HFD consumption appears to affect synaptic markers, while social isolation affected BDNF signaling more significantly.

Isolation stress and consumption of palatable diet changes metabolism in a sex-specific manner. Prepuberty female rats were more prone to stress effects on food consumption, while males showed more long-lasting effects, being more susceptible to a metabolic programming after the consumption of a palatable diet.

Tamoxifen (TAM) is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) used in the treatment of breast cancer; however many women complain of weight gain during TAM treatment. The anorectic effects of estradiol (E) and TAM are well known, although the effects of E on the consumption of palatable food are controversial and there is no information regarding the effects of TAM on palatable food consumption. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of chronic treatment with estradiol and/or tamoxifen on feeding behavior in ovariectomized rats exposed to standard chow and palatable foods (Froot Loops® or chocolate). Additionally, parameters such as body weight, uterine weight, lipid profile and plasma glucose were also measured. Wistar rats were ovariectomized (OVX) and subsequently injected (ip.) for 40 days with: E, TAM, E+TAM or vehicle (OVX and SHAM - controls). Behavioral tests were initiated 25 days after the start of treatment. Froot Loops® consumption was evaluated in a novel environment for 3 min. Standard chow intake was evaluated for two days and chocolate intake for 7 days in the home cage in a free choice model (chocolate or standard chow). Rats injected with E, TAM and E+TAM groups showed a reduction in body weight and standard chow intake, compared with control groups. With regard to palatable food intake, the E, TAM and E+TAM groups demonstrated increased consumption of Froot Loops®, compared with the SHAM and OVX groups. In contrast, all groups increased their consumption of chocolate, compared with standard chow; however the E group consumed more chocolate than the OVX, TAM and E+TAM groups. Despite these differences in chocolate consumption, all groups showed the same caloric intake during the chocolate exposure period; however the TAM and E+TAM groups presented decreased body weight. Treatment with estradiol and tamoxifen showed a favorable lipid profile with low levels of TC, LDL, LDL/HDL ratio and lower levels of plasma glucose. The E group presented high levels of TG and HDL, when compared with the TAM and E+TAM groups. Taken together, results suggest that TAM acted in an estrogen-like manner on the majority of parameters analyzed. However, tamoxifen acts in a different manner depending on the type of palatable food and the exposure. In addition, the TAM group demonstrated weight loss, compared with other groups independently of the type of food presented (palatable food or standard chow), showing a low caloric efficiency.

Environmental factors, like early exposure to stressors or high caloric diets, can alter the early programming of central nervous system, leading to long-term effects on cognitive function, increased vulnerability to cognitive decline and development of psychopathologies later in life. The interaction between these factors and their combined effects on brain structure and function are still not completely understood. In this study, we evaluated long-term effects of social isolation in the prepubertal period, with or without chronic high fat diet access, on memory and on neurochemical markers in the prefrontal cortex of rats. We observed that early social isolation led to impairment in short-term and working memory in adulthood, and to reductions of Na(+),K(+)-ATPase activity and the immunocontent of phospho-AKT, in prefrontal cortex. Chronic exposure to a high fat diet impaired short-term memory (object recognition), and decreased BDNF levels in that same brain area. Remarkably, the association of social isolation with chronic high fat diet rescued the memory impairment on the object recognition test, as well as the changes in BDNF levels, Na(+),K(+)-ATPase activity, MAPK, AKT and phospho-AKT to levels similar to the control-chow group. In summary, these findings showed that a brief social isolation period and access to a high fat diet during a sensitive developmental period might cause memory deficits in adulthood. On the other hand, the interplay between isolation and high fat diet access caused a different brain programming, preventing some of the effects observed when these factors are separately applied.