A. s15i,os,s,I examined r6 specimens, all of rvhich agree with eaclr other in every particular, rvhile ,4, ,uoartrdi shorvs distinct. and marked differences.,, (Oct. 29, rg94 ) rt rvill be seen from the above, that rhe credit of differentiating this uew species is very largely due to x'Ir. pergande. Altriough this beginning of our information corcerni'g it is very i'adeqnate, there wiri, I trusr, be no furtber difhculty about its separation from its congeners, thanks to Mr' Pergande's excellent conrparati'e studies. It is apparent from this and other similar instances, horv great is the advantage of having the types,

This document was printed on recycled paper.

No abstract