No abstract

Introduction: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (B-CPR) is associated with improved out-ofhospital cardiac arrest survival. Community-level interventions including dispatcher-assisted CPR (DA-CPR) and myResponder were implemented to increase B-CPR. We sought to assess whether these interventions increased B-CPR. Methods: The Singapore out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry captured cases that occurred between 2010 and 2017. Outcomes occurring in 3 time periods (Baseline, DA-CPR, and DA-CPR plus myResponder) were compared. Segmented regression of time-series data was conducted to investigate our intervention impact on the temporal changes in B-CPR. Results: A total of 13,829 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases were included from April 2010 to December 2017. Higher B-CPR rates (24.8% versus 50.8% vs 64.4%) were observed across the 3 time periods. B-CPR rates showed an increasing but plateauing trend. DA-CPR implementation was significantly associated with an increased B-CPR (level odds ratio [OR] 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79–2.88; trend OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.04), while no positive change was detected with myResponder (level OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82–1.11; trend OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–1.00). Conclusion: B-CPR rates in Singapore have been increasing alongside the implementation of community-level interventions such as DA-CPR and myResponder. DA-CPR was associated with improved odds of receiving B-CPR over time while the impact of myResponder was less clear.

No abstract

Introduction Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) healing follows the imbibition, inoculation, and revascularization healing model. The stage of imbibition takes approximately 48-72 hours and requires direct contact with the wound for success. Prior to revascularization the graft is at increased risk for damage from shear stress. Many of the protocols in place are based on pathophysiology of wound healing and few published data exist on the timing and logistics of mobilization after lower extremity STSG for burns. There is discordance in the Burn community as to when it is safe to start ambulation with patients after lower extremity skin grafting. The timing of the first dressing change may accelerate or delay ambulation and increase time to hospital discharge. Methods Retrospective chart review of burn patients regardless of age, admitted to burn service with grafted burns to lower extremities, whether they had other concomitant burns with/without grafting to determine if earlier first postoperative dressing changes (≤ 3 days) to grafted lower extremity burns lead to earlier ambulation and shorter hospital stays. Secondary endpoints will be evaluation of the ideal time to change the dressing after initial STSG grafting of the lower extremity without increasing graft failure rates. Results The groups were even in time from surgery to 1st dressing change (1st DC) (167 had a 1st DC in ≤3 days post-op, and 163 had a 1st DC >3 days post-op). Demographics and medical history were nearly identical between the two groups, indicating there may be no association between the demographics or medical history collected and earlier dressing change. Median time from surgery to the 1st DC was 3 days (IQR: 3-5) in the entire sample, and from surgery to staple removal was 5 days (IQR: 4-6). The median length of hospital stay in the entire sample was 10 days, and this slightly differed between groups: those with a 1st DC of ≤3 days had a shorter hospital stay (9 days [IQR: 6-13]) than those with a 1st DC of >3 days (11 days [IQR: 7-16]), this is exemplified in Figure 2. 80.3% of patients were discharged home in the sample, with a greater proportion of patients discharged to a facility when they had a 1st DC >3 days post-op (24.5%) than if they had a 1st DC ≤3 days post-op (15%). A greater proportion of patients were discharged walking (47.6% vs 32.7%) when they had an earlier 1st DC than those who did not. Graft failure was seen in 6 patients with 5 of them needing re-STSG. Four due to graft loss and two due to cellulitis. Conclusions Patients who had 1st DC ≤ 3 days after surgery saw an earlier hospital discharge by 2 days without risk of graft loss due to hematoma or seroma regardless of comorbidities. Applicability of Research to Practice The data gathered will be used to establish a clinical based approach to lower extremity dressing changes. We hope to delineate a timeline based on tailored patient factors that can be used as guideline to safely expedite ambulation and minimize hospital stays without increasing graft failure rates.

Introduction: Female sex is associated with lower receipt of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) in public. Telephone-assisted CPR (TCPR) may attenuate this known sex difference. It is unknown whether the introduction of community-wide, bystander-focused interventions may reduce this known sex difference and improve outcomes for females. Objectives: We sought to assess whether implementation of bystander-focused, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) interventions attenuated the sex difference seen in receipt of BCPR. We hypothesized that implementation of bystander-focused interventions would reduce the known difference observed in males compared to females in receipt of BCPR in public. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of adult, non-traumatic OHCAs from the Singapore OHCA registry (1/2011-12/2020). Bystander-focused interventions included TCPR (7/2012 - present), CPR/AED training (04/2014 - present), and myResponder (4/2015 - present). We examined the differences between males vs females in receipt of BCPR in public using descriptive statistics, a sex-intervention interaction term, and hierarchical regression modeling. Results: The registry contained 19,321 events (2011-2020). Excluding pediatric, traumatic, EMS witnessed, and healthcare facility arrests, 18,925 events were analyzed. Of these, mean age was 68±16 and 64% were male. BCPR was administered in 56% of the events, with 61% of males and 54% of females receiving BCPR in public (p-value <0.01). Females had a 29% decreased odds of receiving BCPR compared to males in public (OR: 0.72 (95% CI: 0.58-0.90), p-value <0.01). With inclusion of implementation of bystander-focused interventions as an interaction term with sex, the difference in receipt of BCPR between males and females was no longer observed (p-value: ns). The sex-intervention interaction term was statistically significant (p-value<0.01). No sex differences were observed when modelling survival as an outcome. Conclusion: The introduction of community-wide, bystander-focused interventions may lessen differences seen in receipt of BCPR by males and females in public. Further research on OHCA interventions is needed to increase provision of BCPR and consider addressing this disparity.