Background: Markers of lipid and glucose metabolism are used in both clinical practice and research. Detection of abnormal laboratory results often relies on speciesspecific reference intervals, but interbreed variation can also affect data interpretation. Objectives:The purpose of the present study was to compare concentrations of selected biochemical variables among different dog breeds. Methods:We analyzed a database containing information on biochemical variables from 534 dogs belonging to nine different breeds. All dogs were confirmed to be healthy based on history, physical examination, and ancillary tests. Concentrations of glucose, fructosamine, insulin, cholesterol, triglycerides, fatty acids, and C-reactive protein were compared using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests.Results: All variables tested showed significant interbreed differences, although all breeds remained within the previously established RIs for dogs. Fructosamine, insulin, and cholesterol showed a wide interbreed variation that could affect the interpretation of results. Conclusions:Breed is an important factor to consider when assessing energy metabolism in dogs, especially for markers like fructosamine, insulin, and cholesterol, which vary considerably among breeds.

No abstract

Serum triglyceride concentrations increase in dogs in overweight condition, which is typically assessed by body condition score (BCS). However, their associations with other markers of energy homeostasis are poorly characterized. The present study aimed to evaluate the associations between both BCS and triglyceride levels and other markers of lipid and glucose metabolism in healthy dogs in overweight condition. 534 overweight, but otherwise healthy, client-owned dogs were included. Serum concentrations of cholesterol, free fatty acids, triglycerides, insulin, glucose and fructosamine were measured. Dogs were assigned to lean (BCS: 3-5) or overweight (BCS: 6-7) categories, and linear models were used to assess the differences between BCS categories and the associations between triglycerides and the other variables, correcting for the effect of breed. Globally, "overweight" dogs had greater serum cholesterol (95% CI: 5.3-6.2 mmol/L or 205-237 mg/dL versus 5.1-5.4 mmol/L or 198-210 mg/dl, P = .003), insulin (95% CI: 17.5-22.1 μU/ml versus 16.7-18.0 μU/ml, P = .036) and were older (95% CI: 4.0-5.3 versus 3.4-3.7 years, P = .002) than lean dogs. Triglyceride concentrations were positively associated with fructosamine (r2 = 0.31, P = .001), cholesterol (r2 = 0.25, P < .001), insulin (r2 = 0.14, P = .003) and glucose (r2 = 0.10, P = .002), and negatively associated with free fatty acids (r2 = 0.11, P < .001). There was no association between triglyceride levels and age. In conclusion, both BCS and triglyceride concentrations were associated with other markers of glucose and lipid metabolism in overweight, but otherwise healthy dogs. Triglyceride concentrations were associated with an increase in insulin and fructosamine that might reflect an early-phase impairment in glucose tolerance which, surprisingly, was concurrent with lower basal free fatty acids.