Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and accuracy of existing computed tomography (CT) methods for measuring the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in uninjured, paired cadaveric specimens and in simulated malreduction models. It was hypothesized that a repeatable set of measurements exists to accurately and quantitatively describe the typical forms of syndesmotic malreduction using contralateral ankle comparison. Methods Twelve cadaveric lower‐leg specimen pairs were imaged with CT to generate models for this study. Thirty‐five measurements were performed on each native model. Next, four distinct fibular malreductions were produced via digital simulation and all measurements were repeated for each state: (1) 2‐mm lateral translation; (2) 2‐mm posterior translation; (3) 7‐degree external rotation; (4) the previous three states combined. The modified standardized response mean (mSRM) was calculated for each measurement. To assess rater reliability and side‐to‐side agreements of the native state measurements, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) were calculated, respectively. Results The most responsive measurements for detecting isolated malreduction were the Leporjärvi clear space for lateral translation, the Nault anterior tibiofibular distance for posterior translation, and the Nault talar dome angle for external rotation of the fibula. These measurements demonstrated fair to excellent inter‐rater ICCs (0.64–0.76) and variable side‐to‐side PCCs (0.14–0.47). Conclusions The most reliable method to assess the syndesmosis on CT was to compare side‐to‐side differences using three distinct measurements, one for each type of fibular malreduction, allowing assessment of the magnitude and directionality of syndesmosis malreduction. Reliable evaluation is essential for assessing subtle syndesmosis injuries, malreduction and surgical planning.
Background The diagnosis of incomplete acute and chronic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears can be challenging with conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, particularly for injuries in which the ligament appears continuous as occurs with chronic PCL tears that have scarred in continuity. Quantitative mapping from MR imaging may provide additional useful diagnostic information in these cases. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of quantifying transverse relaxation time (T2) mapping values at 3 Tesla (T) in a prospectively enrolled patient cohort with chronic PCL tears. Methods Twelve subjects with acute or chronic functionally torn PCL, confirmed on clinical exam and posterior knee stress radiographs (with 8 mm or more of increased posterior tibial translation), were enrolled prospectively over a span of 4 years (age: 28–52 years, injury occurred 2 weeks to 15 years prior). Unilateral knee MR images were acquired at 3 T, including a multi-echo spin-echo T2 mapping scan in the sagittal plane. For the six subjects with a continuous PCL on MR imaging the PCL was manually segmented and divided into proximal, mid and distal thirds. Summary statistics for T2 values in each third of the ligament were compiled. Results Across the six patient subjects with a continuous ligament, the mean T2 for the entire PCL was 36 ± 9 ms, with the highest T2 values found in the proximal third (proximal: 41 ms, mid 30 ms, distal 37 ms). The T2 values for the entire PCL and for the proximal third subregion were higher than those recently published for asymptomatic volunteers (entire posterior cruciate ligament: 31 ± 5 ms, proximal: 30 ms, mid: 29 ms, distal: 37 ms) with similar methodology. Conclusion Mean T2 values were quantified for acute and chronic PCL tears in this prospectively enrolled patient cohort and were higher than those reported for asymptomatic volunteers. This novel approach of using quantitative mapping to highlight injured areas of the posterior cruciate ligament has potential to provide additional diagnostic information in the challenging case of a suspected posterior cruciate ligament tear which appears continuous, including chronic tears that have scarred in continuity and may appear intact on conventional magnetic resonance imaging.
This study measured characteristic glenoid and humeral head cartilage T2 values over the area mappable with two planes. Importantly, this study demonstrated that two-dimensional mapping in a single plane or two combined planes cannot capture the entirety of the semi-spherical humeral head cartilage. This highlights the need for three-dimensional T2 mapping techniques in the shoulder.
Objective The purpose of this work was to compare measurements of talar cartilage thickness and cartilage and bone surface geometry from clinically feasible magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against high-accuracy laser scan models. Measurement of talar bone and cartilage geometry from MRI would provide useful information for evaluating cartilage changes, selecting osteochondral graft sources or creating patient-specific joint models. Design Three-dimensional (3D) bone and cartilage models of 7 cadaver tali were created using (1) manual segmentation of high-resolution volumetric sequence 3T MR images and (2) laser scans. Talar cartilage thickness was compared between the laser scan– and MRI-based models for the dorsal, medial, and lateral surfaces. The laser scan– and MRI-based cartilage and bone surface models were compared using model-to-model distance. Results Average cartilage thickness within the dorsal, medial, and lateral surfaces were 0.89 to 1.05 mm measured with laser scanning, and 1.10 to 1.22 mm measured with MRI. MRI-based thickness was 0.16 to 0.32 mm higher on average in each region. The average absolute surface-to-surface differences between laser scan– and MRI-based bone and cartilage models ranged from 0.16 to 0.22 mm for bone (MRI bone models smaller than laser scan models) and 0.35 to 0.38 mm for cartilage (MRI bone models larger than laser scan models). Conclusions This study demonstrated that cartilage and bone 3D modeling and measurement of average cartilage thickness on the dorsal, medial, and lateral talar surfaces using MRI were feasible and provided similar model geometry and thickness values to ground-truth laser scan–based measurements.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.